Thanks to Dan Stauft for this information.

QUESTION: How do you reset the Change
Engine Oil light?
ANS: 1. Turn key to run, but do not start the car.
2. Press ENG MET on the trip monitor, then within 5 seconds, press it again.
3. Within 5 seconds, press and hold GAUGES on the trip monitor. The CHANGE
OIL light should flash.
4. Hold the GAUGES or RANGE button until the CHANGE OIL light stops flashing
and goes out. This should take about 10 seconds.

QUESTION: Do after market chips
really make a difference?
ANS: I think we should first discuss basics here, because I think most of
these "chip" discussions are more involved with "mine's better than yours", etc.
than realistic expectations. The power production of our engines is a function
of many factors, but a few basics dominate. The first and most important factor
involves how much air the engine can pump. This is the part of power production
that gets most of the attention. Hear me now and believe me later, "more mass of
air moved equals more horsepower."
Naturally, the biggest part of this is the actual displacement of the
engine. Consequently, everything else being equal, bigger is better. (The
builders of the Viper took this one to the bank!) In the same vein, everything
else being equal (hard to achieve) higher RPM is better. If volumetric
efficiency were constant at all speeds, obviously higher speeds move more air.
This brings up the other main area of concern with increasing the mass of
air moved - volumetric efficiency. This is where most people spend most of their
effort. This encompasses air cleaners, ducts, head flow, valve sizes, exhaust
systems, cam profiles, etc. Some of these areas affect air flow at all speeds;
others, e.g. cam profiles favor specific RPM ranges. Again, in all these areas
increasing the mass of air flow is the objective since it is directly related to
power. Of course, the ultimate in volumetric efficiency is to be greater than
100%. That's exactly where supercharging and turbocharging comes in.
Factors other than increasing mass air flow that are related to power output
include compression ratios, combustion dynamics and parasitic losses.
As far as calibrations go, they are only involved when they're wrong. In
other words, having precisely the optimum air-fuel ratio is of minor importance.
Having the optimum spark advance is of more consequence. However, getting both
of these right is not difficult and doesn't vary substantially with the other
elements mentioned above. Consequently, with computer controlled systems as used
in the LT5, a fairly wide variation of engine basics can occur and the engine
will still be very close to optimum full throttle fueling and spark advance.
Therefore, for full throttle power the prospect of magic increases through
calibration changes is unlikely.
Thanks to Jim Ingle from GM Power Team for the above information.

QUESTION: How come I can't purchase
an original ZR-1 battery?
ANS: It seems that the original battery (75Z-72) has been discontinued by
AC-Delco, General Motors and the authorized "upgraded replacement" is now
(75B-84). This replacement battery is a Delco Freedom 84 series battery and is
warranted for 84 months from the date of purchase as compared to 72 months for
the original. It also has an increase in CCA (Cold Cranking Amps) of 735 CCA as
compared to the original 690 CCA. The new battery is noticeably heavier, has a
black case, and raised reinforcement ridges on both ends. The label is slightly
different in color & number, but all else is the same.
From ACDelco:
The correct battery number, with the eye at the opposite end, is battery number
75A-72. Part number 75Z72 has been discontinued.
Thanks to
ACDelco Customer Assistance for
this info.
UPDATE 1/31/00: A newer battery has been introduced for the ZR-1, 75-7YR.
The hydrometer eye is placed in a standard position on the 75-7YR replacement
battery. The hydrometer is not a method to check the wellness of the battery.
The hydrometer eye is only an indicator to see if your battery is ready for a
load test. For a load test to be performed the battery would be disconnected and
not in the vehicle, thus allowing the hydrometer eye to be viewed.

QUESTION: I bought a '90 or '91 and I
didn't get an owners kit? What is in this owners kit?
ANS: For '90 and '91 GM had a "special" ZR-1 Customer Kit created. It was
mailed to the original owners (car registered to) name/address after purchase,
but only went to US customers.
The kit came in a vinyl wrapped box with the ZR-1 logo and is the size of a
pizza box, only higher. Inside it contained:
1- A duplicate window sticker.
2- A Leather portfolio with ZR-1 logo and a metal tag with your vin number and
or name/vin number.
3- A Photo album/coffee table book (90 and 91 were different).
4- Video tape, again different for 90 and 91.
5- A ZR-1 specific owners manual with ZR-1 logo.
6- A Brass Key ring with ZR-1 logo.
On the open market these can sell from $300 to $1,000.
Click here to see a picture of a 1990
owners kit.

QUESTION: Are there any options that
are rare on a ZR-1?
ANS: There were really only two options, electronic climate control and dual
roofs. The electronic climate control was drop as an option in 1991 and became a
standard. Very few '90 ZR-1's were delivered with manual climate control. Rumors
were around 14 ZR-1's had manual AC.
Something unusual happen in the 1992 model year. An option that was standard
in the RPO ZR1 package was dropped 1/2 way though the 1992 year. The power
passenger seat AC1 which had always been packaged into the ZR1 option was pulled
and had to be ordered separately.
In 1993 GM once again included AC1 as part of the RPO ZR1 option.
Not an option but early '90 ZR-1's had steel 1/2 shafts in the rear vs
aluminum on all others.

QUESTION: I'm getting noise over my
radio?
ANS: There could be several reasons for noise over your radio. Here are a
couple of problems that ZR-1 owners have found and corrected.
The noise/squeal described is exactly what my 90 did, first to the right rear
speaker/amp then to the left rear speaker/amp. When the right rear finally
failed (Yes you could turn the radio off/on and the noise would go away but it
finally completely failed) I took the assembly out (3-4 screws and a disconnect)
and took the amp apart. It was obvious the amp was bad as you could see where
the circuit board had gotten hot and the power transistors were fried.
The Delco/Bose systems installed in 90 and up Corvettes apparently are prone
to a failure in the rear speaker amps. The problems first appear as a loud
alternator wine and popping that seems to come from the whole system rather than
any one speaker and at first you can turn the system off then on and it will
sometimes go away. To troubleshoot you can disconnect the rear speakers one at a
time to find the problem. This involves using a screwdriver to remove the
speaker covers and disconnecting the wires that come from the radio. After
finding which side is bad you can remove the speaker assembly using a 7MM
socket. The amp will have one of the following part # 16148750 or 16148752. I
have tried various parts houses but these #'s listed as a back order item that
nobody had seen in years and were doubtful about getting. They also listed the
following as the latest replacement # that they could order 16179367 which has a
dealer list of $354 a dealer cost of $285. Since the first #'s are not available
I talked to Hamp at Speedometer Service in Atlanta Ga and he will ship at dealer
cost to those who are in need. His phone is 1-800-241-2385 and he will take
VISA/Master. If I get any other information I will post it. Hamp is very
knowledgeable on these systems and does rebuild dash units as well as the
radios.
Another possible problem could be an alternator. A "high-pitched whine"
suggests possibly alternator produced noise. And the note that it goes away with
the engine off relates to that possibility as well. Alternators can deteriorate
to produce RF (Radio Frequency) emissions while continuing to function
otherwise, so that may be related. Another whole class of problems with cars
relates to "ground faults". If there is a poor (high resistance) path to ground
of the radio, it can result in performance loss. A quick check is to temporarily
run a wire from the radio case to ground (preferably the battery ground
terminal) and see if it affects your problem. If so, consider some more
permanent arrangement. Finding and repairing poor original equipment grounds can
get messy. I believe the Service Manual Electrical Section shows ground points,
so it may be worth referencing (if you have access to one).
Other sources for radio parts:
-Baker Automotive has the unit you're looking for. Call Kim Baker for prices
at 413-596-9475. Baker is a race car driver, so his "used" parts are actually
removed from new Vettes he gets and converts to race cars.
-Buy a used one out of a wrecked Vette from Roy Landrum Enterprises-
606-586-6218 - Office 513-535-8688 - Mobile
-Contact United Radio in NY. 1-800-448-0944 They Do a lot of warranty work
for GM
-Brad's Corvettes - via internet at
bradscorvettes@flinet.com Price was $100
for speaker and amp.
-C&S Corvettes - 1-800-886-5064. $120.
-Vette Wrecks - 1-800-462-0123. $150
- Contemporary Corvette (advertises in Corvette Fever and Vette). $75
- America Corvette in Atlanta just received 500 new amps. They also purchased
new speakers, and radios. They are selling the amps for $60.00 a piece, that's
correct $60.00 new. These amps are also higher output, 50 watts vs 30 watts
stock.
You can call Jim Bressner at 1-800-377-6793 to order.
Past and Present Automotive in Clearwater Fl 813-535-7288 will repair all Bose
speaker amps.
Another member this with his amps.
Several people on the net have expressed a desire to learn more about repairing
the Bose speaker amps.
There are probably six or seven manufacturers of small electronic capacitors in
the world (just a guess). One of the companies apparently manufactured poor
quality parts in the 1988-92 era. Time and humidity cause the capacitors to leak
electrolyte and fail after a couple of years.
I have a 1989 Toyota Supra and the stereo went bad a couple of years ago. The
stereo in my sister's '89 Supra also went bad, as did the stereo in a friend's
'91 Supra and all of the Supras made during that time period. I took my Supra to
a radio repair shop and the guys were intimately familiar with the problem -
leaking capacitors. The fix was to replace the capacitors.
When the left rear speaker in my ZR-1 recently quit working, I called a local
repair shop. They have been very busy the past couple of years repairing Bose
amps. The problem is... you guessed it - bad capacitors. My Corvette is a '90
model and Bose apparently bought capacitors from the same manufacturer that
Toyota's stereo supplier, Fujitsu, did.
There are eight small green colored capacitors in each rear amp that look like
miniature Sprite cans. I replaced them all. They are all high temp (105 C) mini
radial electrolytics with various capacitance and voltage values. You can get
these at a large electronic supply store for $.50 to $.75 each. I bought mine
here in Houston at Electrotex (713) 526-3456. If you have never desoldered and
soldered anything before, find a friend who has and learn from him. Capacitors
are polar, so make note of where the positive and negative sides are connected
to the board before removing the old capacitors so that the new ones may be
installed correctly. The negative side of capacitors is marked with a
longitudinal band.
After the replacement, I reinstalled the amp in the beast and the speaker now
plays perfectly.
Some people have posted on the net that they believe the amps fail due to heat
buildup destroying the power transistors. I have heard that the failed boards
have brown spots on them with is assumed to have come from overheating. My
observation was that the board became discolored (brown) where it was contacted
by leaking electrolyte from the capacitors. Anyway, since I have heard that the
new style amps have a larger heat sink area than the old style, I exercised
precaution and applied some white dielectric heat conducting grease to the two
power transistors where they contact the metal cover. The stamped sheet metal amp
cover serves dual duty as a RF shield and heat sink. By the way, the high temp
capacitors are made to withstand 105 degrees C, which is pretty darned hot.
Thanks to William Barrett for this info.
FROM AMP OPTIONS:
We at Amp Options have a product you might be interested in. We have developed
an amp to replace the Bose* type amp in car stereo's 84 and up with minimal
install hassle. In fact, with 91 and up simply remove bad Bose* type amp and
plug our amp in. Pre 91 requires chopping of the wire harness and connecting
with a connector supplied by us. Each amp is built and tested in the USA and
comes with a two year limited warranty. Amps come in a box of twelve at $79.95
per amp, connectors are $3.29 apiece and also come in a box of twelve. Each amp
is individually boxed and comes with instructions on installing the product.
Every amp comes with a gain adjustment to synchronize the volume with current
factory amps still in the vehicle. Any order $2,000.00 or more is shipped
prepaid. If you would like to deal in volume please contact me to discuss the
price further. Thank you for your time, if you have any questions or comments
contact me at:
e-mail at: loki251638@aol.com
or call between 8:00 AM to 9:00 PM EST at 770-638 0359
Sincerely,
Michael Knoll
Factory Representative

QUESTION: I'm hearing a strange
rattle sometimes at certain RPM's?
ANS: It's always difficult to describe noises and to understand what the
description means. A possibility is a rattle from an exhaust system heat shield.
You may have a loose, missing or broken fastener or the part may have shifted
such that it's contacting another part. These rattles tend to be very "peaky" so
they occur in a very small RPM window.
Another possible reason could be the dual mass flywheel. The dual mass
flywheel is just what the name implies. It's two flywheels connected by a spring
damper system. The engine crankshaft bolts to the forward flywheel and the
clutch attaches to the rear one. It does not change position with speed but it
does "wind up" with torque. It's purpose is to control transmission gear rattle.
Replacing the flywheel with a conventional single mass flywheel will result in a
very high level of gear rattle.

QUESTION: I'm getting a squeal from
my clutch?
ANS: The problem you're most likely experiencing is a noisy crankshaft pilot
bushing. There is a later design released for service that tends to retain
grease better than the one you have and therefore doesn't squeal when cold.
Unfortunately, the transmission has to be removed to access the bushing, so it's
not a minor repair although the part cost itself is trivial.
In the event you're not familiar with these parts, the input shaft to the
transmission is externally spined to connect to the inside spine of the clutch
disk. The forward tip of the transmission shaft is a smooth section that is
located radically by the bushing in the end of the crankshaft. When the clutch is
engaged (foot off the pedal) the transmission input shaft turns with the
crankshaft, so there's no relative motion. However, when the clutch is released
(foot on the pedal) such as when you're at a traffic light, the transmission
shaft is not turning and the crankshaft is. This is when the squeal would occur
with a dry bushing.
The new bushing has grooves in it to help it retain grease and it seems to
have solved the problem.
Thanks to Jim Ingle for his input.

QUESTION: How can I tell either the
coolant temp or oil temp from the analog gauges?
ANS: See chart below:
Percentage
of Scale |
LT5 Oil Gauge
READING | ACTUAL |
Coolant Gauge
READING | ACTUAL |
| 0 % |
100 deg F | 100 deg F |
100 deg F | 100 deg F |
| 25 % |
-------- | 191 deg F |
-------- | 184 deg F |
| 50 % |
-------- | 220 deg F |
-------- | 210 deg F |
| 75 % |
-------- | 246 deg F |
-------- | 232 deg F |
| 100 % |
280 deg F | 280 deg F |
260 deg F | 260 deg F |
Thanks to Gordon Killebrew for the chart.

QUESTION: My ZR-1 runs hot, anything
I can do to improve this?
ANS: For some applications it is known that the stock ZR-1 cooling system has
proven to be inadequate. This has been born out through observations by many
individuals on the ZR-1 Network. Various options have been explored with one
option, two suppliers, proving the be the most viable fix to over heating.
The larger radiator from Doug Rippie Motorsports and the unit from
Lingenfelter Performance Engineering both have proven themselves to be very well
made pieces of equipment. They do an excellent job at keeping engine
temperatures in a very comfortable zone under the most extreme conditions of
operation. Typical operating temperatures run in the 90c-97c range, the upper
end under track conditions. This is well below the 112c temperatures witnessed
by several people.
With many members of the ZR-1 Net having installed one of these units, not
one disparaging remark has been made, only glowing reports. We all highly
recommend one of these units in addition to a Doug Rippie modified thermostat.
In bang for your buck, this is one of the best values you can possibly do.
Thanks to Jim Milstead for this information.
More important for proper cooling, is a clean and unobstructed radiator, and
possibly a modified prom calibration. Take a half day and remove the top shroud
of your radiator from the top. Look down in between the AC condenser and the
radiator and you'll be shocked. If car show judges could find a bent up mirror to
get down in there, all you waxers would be in misery! It's filthy! As Corvettes
are bottom feeders, we've found that the radiator's airflow is severely
obstructed in many cars. This is not visible from the bottom but sometimes you
can see a little through the oil cooler line cut outs in the passenger side of
the shroud. We've also made a pipe that screws onto a hose that is about 3
feet long. At the end, we put a 90 deg. elbow. After the shroud is removed, this
pipe can be used to "reverse" flush the radiator fins with water. This will
help. Just for info: We've also found that most ZR1's out here in furnace land
will gradually start overheating after 3 to 4 years no matter what. With the
addition of a new radiator, they run cooler than ever. Adding a Stant t-stat and
recalibrated prom helps even more.
Also the stock cooling fans were manufactured with several air holes in the
case. Wet climates or washing the shroud area will allow water to settle within
the electric motor. Along with dirt and dust, this causes the motors to get weak
over time. The new motors, part number 15-8484, do not have any breather holes
and are a sealed unit which eliminates this problem. In addition, I believe they
turn more RPM's.
You'll also want the new blades 15-8468 which flow much more air than stock.
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this info.
More on cooling........
There is a coolant bypass device in the stock ZR1 cooling system which does
compromise the cooling ability of the package, the same is true of the oil
cooling system. My recommendation is to install an aftermarket radiator with
sufficient flow capacity to cope with the 100 USGPM that the water pump is
capable of. But I would strongly advise against altering the pressure setting of
the radiator since the system is very sensitive to pressure variation. The
typical failure mode with either too little or too much pressure is material
erosion in the pump itself (caused by cavitations) and also in the cylinder liner
and seat areas caused by nucleate boiling. Which is basically small pockets of
super heated coolant near the metal surface flashing to steam and eating away at
the part in question. During its development phases the LT5 was run at several
dyno facilities other than Lotus, each time we had to ensure the correct
parameters for the cooling system or holes would appear in the early running
life of the engine. So if you wish to change the system pressures be warned,
puddles of coolant may be prone to appearing on the floor and/or the oil level
in the pan may rise.
In so far as the oil cooler is concerned, the stock unit is not capable
of dealing with the heat rejected to the engine oil at sustained high
speed operation, no matter when the waxstat opens. So fit a cooler that
is and then it doesn't matter where the stat opens since the cooler is
capable of coping with the heat rejected by the engine. If people insist
on earlier opening of the oil cooler lines then simply buy and fit a
lower temp waxstat, since the unit is pretty similar to many water
thermostat devices, this should not be too hard to find. Furthermore
there is a constant controlled leak across the valve to ensure that
cooler opening in extreme cold conditions does not result in oil
pressure loss due to the cold slug of oil being pushed into the engine.
P.S. the amount of power to coolant flow rate was 4bhp to 1 gpm as a rough rule
of thumb.
Thanks to Graham Behan of Lingenfelter for the above info.

QUESTION: I need to touch up my
'94/'95 wheels, what color paint do I use?
ANS: Go to your local hobby store the one that sells plastic models, and get
a paint that is made by Tamiya. Its called Tamiya color, Acrylic Paint and the
code number is X-11 (chrome silver). Don't worry about the color (chrome sliver)
when it dries its the exact same color as the wheel. Just remember to stir the
paint and do not shake it.
Touch up the ding with a small soft brush filling the ding to just higher
than the surface of the surrounding paint. Let dry for 24hrs then lightly buff
down with some polishing compound to the same surface level of the rest of the
paint. Be sure that the wheel is cool before attempting to touch it up.
Thanks to Pete Bordonali for this info.
Another member has found Testors #1181 Aluminum FLAT ENAMEL in the little tiny
bottle (like kids and dads use for model airplane building). It is very close
and looks great. And it's cheap - $1.10 at Michaels craft stores. It makes the
outside wheel weights almost disappear too.
Thanks to Randy Schulkers for this info.

QUESTION: I'm having problems with my
INFL REST light coming on.
ANS: Well, it seems as if all us 90 owners have experienced the famous "INFL
REST" problem. I have also had the problem, and in my case I was able to fix it
for free. Mine was a code "25" which is a "Front Sensor #2 (RH); Open Circuit".
The most likely reason for this failure is corrosion under the sensor. The
reason for the corrosion is AC accumulator run-off. The water drips down from
the accumulator and runs down the frame rail to the sensor. It wicks under the
sensor, and corrodes the bolts and holes. This opens the connection to ground,
and creates the error #25 condition. Mine goes out each summer (when I'm using
the AC) and I have to re-clean the connection. Here's the procedure to fix.
1. Read the stored codes. (They remain, even after a battery is disconnected)
1a. Turn ignition switch to "Off". 1b. Ground ALDL terminal "K" to ground ("A").
Consult the manual pg. 9J-A-3 for picture of ALDL connector. (Too hard to
explain)
1b. Turn ignition switch "On".
1c. The flashes of the "INFL REST"
indicator lamp correspond to the digits of the two digit malfunction codes. Code
12 will be displayed three (3) times, followed by any other codes, which may be
stored. Each code will flash three (3) times. After all the codes are displayed,
the sequence starts over with "12" again. If you have a code "25", you can
proceed. Here is a total listing of all the codes;
14 Front Sensor #1 (LH); Short to Ground
15 Front Sensor #1 (LH); Open
Circuit
16 Front Sensor #1 (LH); Sensor Fault
24 Front Sensor #1 (RH); Short to
Ground
25 Front Sensor #1 (RH); Open Circuit
26 Front Sensor #1 (RH); Sensor
Fault
31 Inflator Squib; Current leakage to Battery
32 Inflator Squib; Current
shorted to battery voltage
33 Inflator Squib; Current leakage to ground
34
Inflator Squib; Current shorted to ground
35 Inflator Squib; Open circuit
36
Inflator Squib; Squib fault
41 Indicator lamp circuit; Shorted to battery or
ground
42 Indicator lamp circuit; Open circuit
51 Diagnostic unit faulty
52
Firing sequence confirmation set
53 Firing current confirmation set
54 Squib
current has flowed
2. Disconnect the battery. (You don't want the SIR to fire when your
working) You should also wait 30 minutes after disconnecting battery before
working any SIR problem.
3.Remove the passenger side front tire.
3a.Remove the
rear inner wheel well. It has an assortment of Torx and hex head bolts.
3b. You
will now be able to see the sensor, which is mounted on the frame rail. (It is
located towards the back of the wheel well area. The box is around 2x3".
3c.The
sensor has 2 different bolts securing it. (13mm and 10mm I think). Remove them
(Yes, it's is very hard to get the rear one out).
3d. Carefully work the sensor
forward out of its position. The cable has some slack, and will allow a few
inches of movement. It is just enough to get the sensor up out of the way, to
allow for cleaning.
3e. Once removed, you can clean up the surface and apply some
dielectric grease to the surface to keep the water out. Make sure you clean both
the frame and the sensor. Mine was very wet and greasy. The main grounding comes
from the bolts, so make sure they cleaned up. If the bolts show a lot of
corrosion, replace them.
3f. Carefully reassembly everything. The back bolt again
will be a real bear.
4. Re-connect the battery.
5. You must now clear the codes.
(You may want to try this first, as the water may have evaporated. Sometimes my
codes will go away for months, after simply clearing the codes.
5a.Turn ignition
switch to "Off".
5b.Ground ALDL terminal "K" to ground ("A"). Consult the manual
pg. 9J-A-3 for picture of ALDL connector. (Too hard to explain)
5c.Turn ignition
switch "On".
5d.The codes will flash as before.
5e. Wait for the fault codes
to flash. (Approx. 5 seconds). When they do, unground ALDL terminal "K" for 3
seconds +/- 1/2 seconds. (The timing here is critical, and you may have to try a
couple of times). After ungrounding; ground it again for 3 seconds +/- 1/2
seconds. Unground again and wait 10 seconds.
5f.Code 12 should now be the only
fault. If not, redo section 5 again.
It has been a while since I have performed this procedure, so use at your own
risk.
Thanks to Mike Zeeff for this information.

QUESTION: What happens if I remove
all my Low Tire Pressure sensors?
ANS: For the 1990 and 1991 ZR-1's nothing. You will not see any error
indications on your dash. It'll be as if you never had the LTPWS option.
For 1992-1995 ZR-1's your LTPWS error light on your dash may light. Telling
you your system has malfunction. Whenever you remove all 4 wheel sensors you
will get a code 99. It may not appear right at first and can go up to 200 miles
before it turns the light on and sets the code, but it will happen. There are
two things that can be done and both require removing the DIC.
One is to remove the 2 lights in the upper right hand corner of the DIC and the
other is to unplug the module. This can be done by using a hook to fish the
connector out to where you can unplug it.. The module is attach to the right
side of the speedo cluster and can be seen through the hole behind the DIC. It
has a pink wire and a black wire going to it, after 91 there is a third wire,
tan.
The easiest thing to do is to remove the DIC and remove the 2 light bulbs or you
can also remove the cruise control fuse, which will also disable illumination of
the LTPWS lights; of course, that option disables the cruise control function.
Thanks to Jim VanDorn and Jerry Watts for this information.

QUESTION: Sometimes I have problem
with my ZR-1 not starting.
ANS: Could be one of several problems.
1. The VATS system.
2. A starter problem.
3. The clutch safety switch.
For number one, VATS, a quick way for a technician to diagnose a VATS problem
is to hook up a Tech 1 scanner. When the vehicle fails to start, display the
VATS parameter and note what it says. If it says "VATS enabled" then you've
tripped the VATS system and have eliminated other possibilities. This will reset
itself after 5 minutes provided NO OTHER ATTEMPTS TO START, OPEN DOORS, ETC
OCCUR. A common cause of the VATS problem is the ignition cylinder, which has
been updated. If this occurs, change to a new (spare) key and try it. Also, if
the VATS system is the problem, try unlocking the driver's door with the door
key a couple of times. As most of you already know, the door key switch
deactivates the UTD alarm and this switch is known to go out after time (it's
obviously the most used).
Also note if the security light is on while trying to start the ZR-1. If it is
then it's your VATS system. Also if you wait 15 minutes and then try to start it
and it starts that also says it is your VATS system.
From Jerry Watts: If the ccm sees the wrong resistance or no resistance when
the key is turned to the start position it will set a code 54. Any time there is
a ccm code that is active your cluster will flash. If the vats system fails, it
will not turn on the fuel pump when you first turn the key on, this you should
be able to hear; also you could not push start the car because of no fuel and
the injector will not be pulsed.
For number 2, the starter, the most probable problem is that your starter has
gotten wet. Have you rinse down the engine lately? If it is the starter, then
you should be able to park it on a hill and turn it off, try the starter and if
it doesn't start, then jump start it by rolling a little. This eliminates the
PASS Theft deterrent system and leaves either the clutch safety switch, or the
starter itself.
From Jerry Watts: G.M. issued a bulletin back in October of 92. While working
at the action center we received a lot of calls concerning this problem. If you
wash your engine or are in a high humidity area the starter can corrode because
of its location. Later the drain hole size was increased to help with this
problem but, it was found this was not a 100% cure. The starter can be taken out
and cleaned and put back if you wish.
For number 3, clutch safety switch, to check the clutch safety switch use an
ohm meter to make sure the switch is opening and closing right or the real fix
for this problem is to remove the switch, re-crimp the wire connectors going to
it, then re-install the switch. In many cases this should fix your starting
problem.
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this information.
Note: From another member on checking clutch switches. There is an easy
way to check the clutch safety switch, assuming the starter isn't starting. Set
the parking brake, put the shifter in neutral, and watch the voltmeter while you
turn the key to the start position. The voltage will drop slightly. While
holding the key in start , release the clutch pedal. If the voltage goes up and
down in response to clutch pedal movement, the clutch switch works.

QUESTION: The feeling of loss power
under heavy acceleration.
ANS: There can be several reasons for the feeling of loss power. One is the
collapse of the air duct. But another possible problem as written by one of our
members.
Since we are on the "loss of power" subject I thought it might be helpful to
share an experience that I had a couple of months ago. I also experienced "loss
of power" under heavy acceleration - she (LT5) just won't hookup. In addition, I
also heard a "moaning" kind of noise that really sounded like a vacuum leak. So
my mechanic, spent a couple of weeks, off and on, chasing the vacuum problem. He
ended up replacing all of the vacuum hoses, tubes and MAP sensor, even those
under the plenum.
None of this helped and the problem persisted. We did notice
something, though, that when he pulled the plenum and looked at the secondaries
it looked like they had not been operational in a while. As a last resort we
called Jerry Watts and Gordon Killebrew. Yes, they diagnosed the problem -
damaged fuel pump. Many thanks to the guys.
Solution: (or my understanding of it) The computer had damaged one of the two
fuel pumps and therefore the engine was starved for fuel under heavy
acceleration. Hence the loud sucking "moaning" sound. So my mechanic replaced
the computer and fuel pump. Guess what.......yep, no more problem. Now she runs
like new.
Thanks to Lauren Groth for this information.
Also on hard high speed turns like on the track you may feel a lost of power
which can happen if your fuel tank is less than half full.

QUESTION: How many 1990 ZR1s were
shipped with manual AC (C60)?
ANS: A total of 124 1990 ZR1s were built with Manual AC (C60). After 1990
Electronic AC (C68) became the standard.

QUESTION: Can the surface of the
flywheel for a ZR-1 be machined?
ANS: The flywheel cannot be machined on the LT5. Get another flywheel and
also order the weight kit (which nobody knows about at the dealer) for balancing
purposes. You will need to look at your present flywheel and note where the
weights are placed in the holes at the outer edge. Insert the new weights in the
matching holes of the new flywheel.
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this info.

QUESTION: Why is the cost for the
valve cover emblems so expensive?
ANS: Nobody knows, but the 1990 emblems are around $22.00 while all other
years are around $125.00. The 90 emblems had a red background behind the bowtie
(84-90 emblem) while 91-95 had a black background.

QUESTION: I understand there is a
build sheet somewhere on the ZR-1?
ANS: Yes in maybe two places. One on the fuel tank and one in the left front
suspension area of the ZR-1.
First the tank sheet and build sheet are the same. It's basically a computer
generated birth certificate for your car. It has the date/time built (actually
its the date the sheet was printed) all the RPO codes, their explanations, and
shows all your codes for the suspension components, seat belts, air bags,
colors, dealership, the whole works.
I've never found one on the interior of a late model, but getting the tank
stickers off is not difficult.
Start by removing the spare tire and tray from underneath the back of the
car.
Lay under the car and look between the gas tank and the vertical piece of
fiberglass where the rear compartment is. You will see the tank sticker the
tank, you can gently remove the paper from the adhesive. How much glue is there
depends on how good a mood the guy at the plant was in that day. I've seen some
with virtually NO glue, to some that were completely glued on. Sometimes, on
some prototypes I've seen, the guys would get cute and write "ZR-1" in the glue.
Usually, ZR-1 is written across the sticker in Red marker. Maybe you will get
lucky and have had someone at the plant leave a personal note on the sticker.
"Kick Ass" and "King of the Hill" are popular themes.
It is definitely worth going after.
If that sticker is missing for some reason, and you really want to know.....
This is supposed to be a secret, but I was never charged with guarding it, so
here goes....There are additional copies of the build sheet in the left front
suspension area of the car. I'm going to take a closer look at one of the '89s
later, but I think if you remove the lower A-arm, and maybe the spring on the
drivers side, you can retrieve it. The paper is inside the cross member where it
is bolted to the frame. A really bright flashlight will allow you to find it by
looking into the oval holes in the cross member from the top (near the motor).
You will see the paper in the hole, then you can figure out how to get to it.
The only one's I've ever retrieved were by dropping the cross member, but its
probably possible to do it without so much disassembly.
Thanks to Ed Simmons for this information.

QUESTION: How good is the clear coat
on my wheels?
ANS: After working for an OEM aluminum wheel supplier in the capacity of
production engineer in charge of the paint process, I can possibly lend a bit of
light to the clearcoat durability issue. This problem is not in any way specific
to either GM or Corvette, it is an industry wide problem that is being addressed
in different ways by the different manufacturers.
As a side note, the company that I worked for supplied wheels to GM, Toyota,
Mazda, Ford, Nissan, Subaru, and a few other companies. Of all of the companies,
GM took the most aggressive approach to solve wheel durability problems found
over the last 7 years or so.
SOME PROBLEMS:
1. Wheels are in the worst possible environment for paint. They get banged
up, cut by wheel weights, go through outrageous temperature fluctuations (32
degrees out, you slam on the breaks in a panic stop, wheels jump 100 degrees or
so in a few seconds, paint stresses as a result), and get hot brake dust spewed
at them constantly.
2. Aluminum can be a bitch to paint, especially when the paint is a clearcoat
over the machined surface. As you may know, water beads up on aluminum (it is
not a really wetable surface). Paint also wants to bead up on the surface -
this would be bad. To coerce the paint into sticking to the aluminum, a
conversion coating must be applied. The most durable clear conversion coating is
chromium chromate (not to be confused with chrome plating). A basic paint
process is as follows: A wheel is sent through a pretreatment system (industrial
washer) where it is cleaned with an alkaline detergent, rinse, converted either
by spray or immersion in an acidic bath composed of chromic acid, accelerators
(fluozirconic acid, for one), and etching agents (hydrofluoric acid, for
example), sent through a series of counter flow rinses (each rinse is fed from
the following stage), and finally rinse with pure deionized water to eliminate
spotting. After all of this, the wheel is clear coated with either a solvent
acrylic clearcoat (i.e. Japanese suppliers) or powder - polyester or acrylic -
clearcoat.
3. The durability adhesion (paint film resistance to peeling from a scribe
line after being introduced to a corrosive environment) tends to improve with
both higher levels of the chromium conversion coating. The problem with this
scenario is that the conversion coating tends to turn green or gold as the
coating weight (area density) of the coating increases. As such, the ideal
conversion coating weight is not always easily attainable when the machined
surface is to be clearcoated. On fully color painted wheels and in the painted
windows of machined wheels, the suppliers can load up on the chrome since the
basecoats will cover the coloration.
SOME SOLUTIONS (PARTIAL LIST):
1. To ensure a more robust conversion coating, many manufacturers are
mandating a deoxidation stage in the washer prior to the chrome stage. This will
ensure that the conversion coating is more uniform and therefore more durable.
This results in a better substrate for the paint to adhere to at any given
coating weights because the weak areas are eliminated.
2. Powder clearcoat technologies (the most widely used clearcoat process for
wheels) are being switched from polyester to acrylic paints. The acrylics are
more resistant to environmental problems, such as peeling and filiform corrosion
(this looks like worm tracks under the painted surface).
3. Some OEM manufacturers are moving away from clear coating machined wheels
and sticking to base/clear wheels (Such as on the later ZR-1s, Indys, Grand
Sports, and Collectors) until the problems can be better addressed.
<< Does anyone have any suggestions on keeping the clearcoat like new. >>
Treat it just like on any other painted surface. I would recommend staying
away from the "wheel cleaners", as some of the ingredients of some of these
cleaners can cause corrosion problems. This information was supplied by a
leading paint manufacturer who tested all of the popular cleaning solutions. I'm
not sure which are good and which are bad, so I avoid them all. I simply slap a
coat of Liquid Glass on the wheels and keep them clean with a moist rag.
Thanks to Dan
Stauft for this information.

QUESTION: How do I know if the
odometer hasn't been changed or the ZR isn't a savage?
ANS: Odometer tampering....Hmm...This is a tough one to catch on any C4
Corvette...Tougher on the '90 and ups, but all anyone has to do with one of
those is swap a CCM out of another car with lower mileage...The only roadblock
in the way of that would be the VATS system...However, if someone is going to go
to the trouble to swap a CCM, he will likely have the capability to scan the CCM
and get its VATS code...It is then a simple matter of cutting a new key (with
the existing pattern) with the right resistance...You can look for loose dash
screws, but that won't tell you much...
The only way to really catch a "clocker" is with the documentation of the
car...Get copies of all the previous titles from the DMV.. Get the previous
registration slips, look for oil change and maintenance receipts....Find out if
it was dealer serviced, and if it was, they can run a complete computer history
of all the maintenance, with the mileages....With this information, it should be
pretty easy to catch something...Look for the obvious signs of high mileage,
such as worn pedals, ripped seats, etc..
I will say, however, that there is potentially nothing wrong with a ZR-1 that
has 200,000 miles on it....It all depends on how well they are taken care of...
Previous wrecks and salvage cars are another valid thing to check for...The
title search will show a salvage history in most cases...It is possible to buy a
car with a "clean" title that has been totaled in the past...I think its good
that you can, because if you buy such a car, assuming you know it was salvaged,
you don't want the hassles of your bank or insurance company not treating the
car with its proper value...
Many will argue that a prior salvage car shouldn't have as much value, but
personally, I disagree...Many cars get totaled and branded with salvage titles
that shouldn't be...It is so easy for a body shop to inflate the damage estimate
of a car they don't want to fix, and have it totaled, its pathetic...Whenever
there is a hurricane or other natural disaster, for example, many cars with just
paint and glass damage get totaled, simply because the body shops can't handle
the load, and the insurance companies don't want to spend thousands on a rental
car while they wait for repairs to be made...
There are also many cars that should be legitimately totaled, but don't get
reported to the insurance, and are then sold with good titles, no matter how bad
the damage...Unfortunately, cars like this sometimes have the Identification
numbers removed and transferred to a stolen car...This is HARD to catch, but
only if done properly.....If you have any doubt, look for the hidden numbers on
the frame rail, look at the engine and trans numbers...Look at the VIN plate
closely....Check the RPO label, and if you have any doubt, check the build
sheet...Documentation, Documentation, Documentation....Most car thieves won't
bother to change everything.. Unfortunately, some dealers end up with cars like
this unknowingly, and then pass them on to the consumer...
You should have nothing to fear from a PROPERLY repaired ZR-1 that has been
damaged, but you can get some leverage in the price, usually...Here are some
clues I've encountered that would indicate that a car has been wrecked or
repainted...
Look on the inner front corners of the front bumper cover where the wiring
for the headlights and parking lights run....Bad repair work always shows up in
UGLY wiring...Look for splices, or misrouted harnesses...This is a dead
giveaway...Also look at the hardware on the radiator support, hood hinges,
etc.. another thing body shops always screw up...Look for cracks in the inner
wheel surrounds...look at the shims on the upper control arms...You will notice
too many, or too few if bad framework was done....Check the tire wear...Look at
the floors for obvious dents or fiberglass repairs...Look for over spray into
the engine compartment...Look for paint on the front spoilers...Also look where
the gaps in the headlight pods would let paint through to the area
underneath...Take out the rear license plate and an inner taillight in the back
bumper...If the gas tank, or a taillight socket is the same color as the body,
its been repainted...Look under the hatch weatherstrip for paint, check the
Federal label on the door, make sure it matches the VIN...If its missing, you
may have had the door changed. Look inside the rear compartments for shattered
hatch glass...You can never get it all out...Look at the door jambs....Ugly
repair work always shows up where the quarters are bonded....Look under the car
for anything obvious...Note, some cars had the paint touched up at the plant, so
don't automatically assume that over spray means the car was wrecked...
If you don't see any of that, more than likely the car was :
A) never hurt, or
B) repaired properly....Again, talk to the previous owners, and get
DOCUMENTATION....
Take a friend along, two sets of eyes are always better than one...
That's a few of my ideas, I'm sure there are more....
Thanks to Ed Simmons for this information.

QUESTION: What if I need a brake job,
what should I look out for?
ANS: I ran across some interesting research GM-STG has done on brake
servicing, specifically brake rotors and customer complaints of brake pulsation
or "shudder" above and beyond ABS brake pedal feedback. Brake work is a huge
business adding up to about 40% of all auto service work in the U.S. Complaints
of "warped rotors", "shudder" and pedal pulsation are generating many of the
repair orders. Recent industry investigating shows that much of the work being
done to eliminate shuddering is actually making the problem worse causing
customer dissatisfaction.
Question why shops fail to adequately repair disc brakes?
-Service techs need the skills of a trained, experienced machinist to machine
disc rotors properly and many simply do not have this level of training.
-The fine finish on today's lightweight brake rotors is almost impossible to
duplicate on many shop brake lathes, no matter how skilled the operator
-Too many lathes in too many shops are poorly maintained. If the arbors are
nicked and worn, the mandrels damaged or dirty or the tool holders are not in
perfect condition, future trouble with any rotors that are machine on that piece
of equipment is a certainty.
When does rotor replacement make sense?
-In many cases machining rotors can create more problems than it solves.
-GM is considering implementation of a new warranty policy that will specify
replacement rather than refinishing of rotors that are worn unevenly, badly
scored (ie: to a depth of .060-in. or more), corroded or are below minimum
thickness.
A perfect repair or replacement of a brake rotor is completely negated if the
service tech does not use a torque wrench or impact gun with an appropriate
torque limiter attached to tighten the lug nuts when remounting the wheel. Not
using those tools invariably results in uneven torque on the lug nuts which will
*always* cause warping or lateral run out of the rotor.
The distorted rotor makes intermittent contact with the pads leading to
uneven rotor wear. The thickness variation resulting from intermittent contact
is what causes the pedal pulsation. Improper tightening of lug nuts is *the
number one* root cause of rotor warpage on all C4s. It is also an issue with
C2/3s with disc brakes, but perhaps not as critical a factor due to the thick
rotors used on those cars.
A recent survey of service techs by *Brake and Front End* magazine shows
rotors are being machine in 75% or more of the brake jobs being performed. This
means that most service techs are conditioned to always machine rotors during
brake jobs...a notion that goes back to the days of heavy disc brakes and
asbestos-based pads. Many of these service techs fail to realize that technology
is, indeed, changing and that rotors do not need to be serviced every time one
changes pads.
Many service techs routinely "rough up" the surfaces of brand-new rotors,
apparently not knowing that today's semi metallic pads need a smooth surface to
be effective. That old practice became inappropriate when the brake parts
industry stopped making asbestos-based pads that used to glaze rotors.
To add to the challenge, GM specifications in most cases limit runout to just
.003-in. on today's rotors and 65-82 rotors ought to be held to .002 in.
Precision machining of this kind also requires removal of all visible rust that
accumulates on the wheel hub flange or on the hub itself because rust flakes are
more than thick enough to cause future pulsation problems.
Any service tech or DIY who thinks the rotors they've worked on are machined
well should put them to test using a profilometer, a stylus that accurately
measures surface irregularities. Rotor faces that look smooth and ready for
reinstallation are routinely shown by profilometer testing to be very poorly
refinished and out of spec. Current rotors are final-machined during the
manufacturing process on precision grinders to ensure proper surface finish, a
finish so fine that it is almost impossible to achieve with most of the brake
lathes currently in use by the service trade.
Lots of information in circulation today has predisposed many people to rotor
refinishing rather than simply not doing any thing with the rotors at all or, if
there is a problem, just replacing them. A 1994 story in *Consumer Reports*
advises readers to "...question whether you really need new discs particularly
if the car is new and the discs have not been machined before." As a result of
this conditioning, many people will demand the rotors be refinished because they
have been taught to do that.
C4 service manuals give specific data as to conditions under which rotors
should or should not be machined and when they should be replaced. I would
advise everyone to consult that information before doing anything with rotors
during a brake job. That has always been my policy on brake work.
For example, my 1988 Chevy Beratta *never* in 100K miles and three sets of
front brake pads ever had the rotors machined. Each time, I inspected the rotors
and measured runout to find all within specs. When it came time to replace the
fourth set of pads, the rotors measured under the minimum thickness so I
replaced them, too, but I did not machine the rotors before installation. I
simply installed new rotors and new pads. My 95 Corvette is not in need of brake
service yet, but when it is ready for pads I will observe the same service
procedure.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for this info.

QUESTION: I'm having a problem with
my ZF 6-speed transmission, how do I repair this?
ANS: 1. Send transmission to ZF. They would require a deposit of about $500,
and would tear down and inspect the transmission. They would then call you and
tell you the diagnosis and an estimate of repair.
Labor rate is approx $80/hr. Repairs have run from $1500 to $4000 depending
on amount of damage and parts required.
ZF America, located in Atlanta, Georgia
Mike Patterson 847-634-3500 ext 263
2. Order a rebuilt ZF through GM STO(or could be SPO). Cost of their rebuilt
is $3300 and $1850 for the core (a deposit until they have yours back)
3. Or go to an independent contractor with ZF that sells both new and rebuilt
units - Melrose T-Tops in Illinois.
Melrose T-Tops Inc.
4310 Ellwalk
Courtland, Ill. 60112
Thanks to Dave Wheeley for above info.
Also you can contact one of the 5 regional distributors listed below:
ZR51 Performance- is a ZF 6-speed repair
shop. Bill Boudreau is very knowledgeable in the repair and care of our 6-speed
transmission. His costs are ~60% that of GM/ZF. He also offers fast turn around
in as little as 3 days. For ZR-1 Net "Gold" members Bill is offering 10% off any
parts used in the repair of your transmission. For more info contact Bill
Boudreau at (602) 740-6277 or send him an email at:
bill777@inficad.com
ZR51 Performance
5612 East Almeda Court
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
1-602-740-6277
Here's a great article on
troubleshooting your ZF transmission.
FORTE'S PERFORMANCE TRANSMISSIONS
474 Moody Street
Waltham, MA. 02453
1-781-647-1530
CONSOLIDATED TRANSMISSIONS
5606 Carder Road
Orlando, FL. 32810
1-800-578-8726
MIDWEST TRANSMISSION CENTER
40312 County 8 Blvd
Zumbrota, Minnesota 55992
1-507-824-2012
ALL TRANS PARTS
1814 N.E. Argtle Street
Portland, Oregon 97211
1-800-237-8601
Another great source for parts and ZF repairs. White Racing Products has ZF
parts as well ZF rebuilds.
For more info contact Kurt White by sending him an
email at KNJW1@aol.com

QUESTION: How do I enter diagnostic
mode for my A/C and how to get digital readout of various engines parameters and
settings?
ANS: To enter diagnostic mode, push and hold the fan up arrow and down arrow at
the same time until the LCD shows -00. You are now in diagnostic mode and may
select any parameter using the up and down arrows. To see the value for that
parameter, press the fan "auto" button.
Note: A minus sign on the display range means to add 100 to the value
displayed. So -155 actually is 255.
| Parameter Number |
Parameter Description System Faults |
Valid Values |
|
0
|
One of these will be set if your A/C controls have a LED flashing |
00 = no Faults
01 = Temp door motor circuit fault
02 = Temp door motor circuit fault
03 = Ambient Sensor Open
04 = Ambient Sensor Short
05 = In-Vehicle Temp Sensor Open
06 = In-Vehicle Temp Sensor Short
07 = Solar Load Sensor Open
08 = Solar Load Sensor Short
09 = Low Freon Detected
10 = UART Failure |
|
1
|
Temp Setting |
60F to 90F |
|
2
|
In-car Temp Sensor |
10 = Hot -130=230 =Cold |
|
3
|
Outside Temp Sensor |
10 = Hot -130=230 = Cold |
|
4
|
Sun Load Sensor |
Max Light Max Dark
L98 38
183
LT5 115 -110 = 210 |
|
5
|
Ignition Sys Voltage |
0 = 9 Volts -155 = 255= 16V |
|
6
|
Engine Speed (RPM / 25) |
|
|
7
|
Vehicle Speed |
|
|
9
|
A/C System Mode |
00 = Off
01 = Recirculation
02 = A/C
03 = Bi-level
04 = Heater
06 = Defrost
07 = Vent
10 = Manual Recirculation |
|
10
|
Blower PWM |
0 = 0 Volts 128 = 14 Volts |
|
11
|
Program Number |
00 = Cold -155 = 255 = Hot |
|
12
|
Mix Number |
-155 = 255 = Cold 00 = Cold |
|
16
|
Coolant Temperature in degrees C |
|
|
17
|
Solar Correction |
114 = Max light 128 = Max dark |
|
30
|
Stored Full Hot value |
0 to 50 |
|
31
|
Temp Door Travel Range |
100 to 200 |
|
34
|
Temp Door Position
Requested |
00 = Full Hot
-153 = 253 = Full Cold |
|
35
|
Compressor On Time |
.1 second increments |
|
36
|
Number of times below critical time |
|
|
37
|
Software version number |
|
NOTE: This was from a '91 ZR-1 document and may be different for other years.
Thanks to Marc Randolph for this info.

QUESTION: Does moving the MAT sensor
help in performance?
ANS: The idea behind relocating the MAT sensor is to delay the onset of air
temperature based spark retard. Put in simpler terms the software that controls
the spark advance has a modifier applied to it after a certain air temperature
that reduces the amount of ignition advance the engine runs.
This is done so in high ambient temps you don't run into wouldn't, what you
are doing by moving the MAT sensor is to increase the chances of running the
engine into detonation.
The favorite trick by some tuners is to also move the temperature threshold
in the software as well and increase the det sensor limits which means you are
running very close to the det borderline all the time.
If you live in an area like the southwest for instance, with this set up you
run a greater risk of engine damage, LT5's are not prone to piston damage from
detonation but do blow head gaskets due to denotation and in extreme cases
damage the cylinder head face (I can send you some nasty photos if you like!!!).
In short, lots of people do but personally I wouldn't, the problems far out
way the gains. Five years of development and testing decided that the MAT sensor
should go where it is!
Thanks to Geoff Jeal for this information.
From Graham Behan on same subject:
The control system, part of which controls the spark timing, of the LT5 is a
relatively simple thing by today's standards only 32 K as opposed to over 2mb on
some trucks. Basically there is a 8 inj table and a 16 inj table for the spark
control along with several algorithms that add or subtract spark depending on
sensor inputs. One of these sensors is the manifold air temp sensor (MAT). Since
a high inlet temperature can lead to a change in the detonation characteristics
of a given mixture we monitor the air inlet temp and modify the commended
ignition advance accordingly. Now with a relatively high compression ratio
engine, such as the LT5, the rate of applied retard for a given temperature
increase is somewhat aggressive. The sensor location in the air horn is not an
ideal place, since the surrounding heated metal can soak heat into the sensor
and give a false high reading, thereby causing a false retard condition. This
placement was largely driven by the philosophy that the LT5 should be a complete
assembly by the time it left the production facility, there are many sound
reasons that support this approach; checking system integrity and reducing
installation time at the vehicle assembly plant to name but two. Now a more
representative place to pick up the actual intake air temp is somewhere that is
relatively thermal insulated from the heat source i.e. the engine, yet is still
in the inlet air flow. So the relocation of the MAT sensor to the filter housing
is quite a valid solution since it is measuring inlet air and the high temp
protection is in place. However modifying the software to minimize the control
system response to a high air temp signal is, in my believe not such a valid
solution. Since the protection algorithm is put there for a reason, high inlet
air temps = tendency to detonate. With the advances in the modern engine
management systems engines are now calibrated closer to the detonation limit of
the fuel. Given this it is correct say that the LT5 was calibrated
conservatively and could tolerate more ignition advance under some
circumstances, as the track results show measure a more representative air temp
and effective spark advance is increased Limit system authority and the same can
be said (at what potential cost). So why not get a representative measurement
increase spark advance and let the system take care of itself in the way it was
designed. PS this cal was set to run on 89 Oct (RON+MON/2) fuel and be safe with
87, i.e. some detonation allowed but to be controlled by the Knock sensor, up
until the 91 MY when a Premium fuel recommended logo was put in place on the gas
filler.

QUESTION: Does installing a lower
temperature thermostat help performance?
ANS: The EMS software contains many tables and functions that are temperature
based, the warm up fuel table for instance has an input directly from the
temperature sensor to give fuel enrichment on start and warm up.
The calibration of these functions and tables is based around the stock
thermostat so lowering the temperature that the engine would normally run at has
a detrimental effect on the calibration and long term the health of the engine.
The engine may appear to produce more power running at 65/70deg C (sorry cant
work in F!!) as the engine is probably receiving more fuel through warm up
enrichment (I would have to look at the source code listing to be sure - can't
remember where the enrichment runs out).
There are numerous temperature references in the software this is only one
example. Apart from the software angle there is also the mechanical
disadvantages of running too cool.
The cooling system itself is marginal, always has been. If the car is being
used for high speed work in high ambient temperatures the best solution is to
improve the system itself.
Hope this makes sense.
Thanks to Geoff Jeal for this information.

QUESTION: I have an oil leak
somewhere?
ANS: Those of you who see oil leaking on the right side of the engine
need to check the oil pressure sensor under the oil filter. It leaks out the
top/connector end of the sensor. The only way to check this is to clean the area
with simple green then drive the car to trace the oil. I would suspect this long
before I would suspect the oil pan. (Been there done that).
The ZR-1 has three sources of leaking oil sensors. Two in the right front top
of the engine listed in the manual and one located under the oil filter, not
listed in the manual!!
The part #s are:
The one in front is the oil gauge pressure sensor updated part # 10243574
The one below that is an oil temp sending unit part # 10096136
The one located under the filter is #25036935
From my experience the first and third above are prone to leaking and the one
under the filter is not easy to change. There is a special socket you can buy to
change these sensors (I bought mine at Pep Boys) that helps but if you have a
large hand you might want to enlist some help.
Thanks to Tyler Townsley for this information.

QUESTION: My oil temperature sensor
is a 3 terminal sensor but the shop manual shows only 2 terminals?
ANS: The correct oil temperature sensor P/N is 10096136 ($20.90 list), and
this is a 3 terminal sensor. The '90 shop manual does not show this correctly -
the 3 terminal sensor was new for '90, and has been used since then. The "C"
terminal provides a variable resistance to case ground for the IP temperature
gauge, while terminals "A" & "B" connect to the thermistor used by the ECM. ("A"
= black wire to ECM internal ground, "B" = dark green wire).
Thanks to Ted M. Godett for this info.

QUESTION: My ZR-1 gear shift knob
rattles?
ANS: Remove the center console and the large plastic piece by the shifter.
This will give you access to the shifter. Pull the shifter boot up and out of
the way. (I did not remove the boot, just pulled it up and out of harms way) On
my '91, there are four chrome nuts on the shifter plate. All four nuts were very
loose, causing a very loud rattle upon acceleration. I tightened all four nuts,
pulled the shifter boot down, replaced the plastic piece, replaced the center
console, tightened all screws in and around the shifter/console areas.
Thanks to Greg Moreland for this info.

QUESTION: How can I get a copy of my
window sticker?
ANS: Contact Triple A Enterprises at 317-875-7635. Or call or call the
National Corvette Museum at 1-800-53vette or visit their web site at
http://www.corvettemuseum.com

QUESTION: What is that keyhole below
the radio for?
ANS: This key is known as the "power key" or "valet" key as it's referred to
sometimes. In the off position the ZR-1 only puts out about 1/2 the hp by
disabling the second set of fuel injectors, valves and what could be described
as your secondaries from coming on. A sort of safety feature that GM felt was
necessary when you have drivers who are unfamiliar with driving automobiles with
that much HP.

QUESTION: What kind of Dyno results
should I see if I Dyno my ZR-1?
ANS: It will depend as no two LT5 engines are the same but here are some
results from one Dyno shop. Remember these numbers reflect rear wheel HP which
is what really counts.
| YEAR |
PEAK HP |
AVE HP |
PEAK TQ |
AVE TQ |
NEG HP |
| 95 |
348.9 @ 6500 |
274.1 |
339.2 @ 5000 |
306.2 |
27.3 |
| *94 |
370.9 @ 6500 |
277.6 |
351.7 @ 5000 |
318.3 |
26.2 |
| 94 |
358.4 @ 6400 |
265.0 |
330.0 @ 5250 |
302.6 |
23.3 |
| 94 |
353.8 @ 6500 |
267.6 |
338.8 @ 5000 |
305.6 |
22.9 |
| 94 |
350.5 @ 6350 |
260.1 |
324.0 @ 5100 |
297.8 |
22.5 |
| 93 |
351.5 @ 6250 |
263.3 |
336.6 @ 5000 |
300.6 |
22.9 |
| 93 |
346.7 @ 6500 |
262.0 |
327.8 @ 5250 |
299.5 |
23.3 |
| 93 |
344.0 @ 6250 |
258.8 |
322.5 @ 5000 |
296.5 |
25.1 |
| *91 |
381.9 @ 6000 |
289.1 |
359.1 @ 5250 |
328.1 |
22.2 |
| 91 |
341.7 @ 5750 |
253.8 |
331.6 @ 4750 |
313.4 |
23.2 |
| 91 |
330.6 @ 5700 |
242.2 |
317.0 @ 4500 |
298.4 |
22.6 |
| 91 |
326.7 @ 5750 |
241.4 |
317.3 @ 5000 |
297.6 |
23.8 |
| 90 |
350.1 @ 5750 |
251.0 |
343.4 @ 4250 |
304.0 |
21.4 |
| 90 |
347.7 @ 5750 |
254.1 |
340.9 @ 4250 |
307.1 |
22.7 |
| 90 |
345.8 @ 5500 |
255.8 |
337.3 @ 5250 |
315.1 |
24.7 |
Most of the cars in this comparison were stock to mildly modified, with the
exception of *.
The modifications to the others were K&N, chips from various mfgs, and
exhaust systems.
Thanks to:
Keith Paulsen
Superior Dyno Service
707-425-DYNO
For the above results.

QUESTION: When I removed my LTPWS
from my wheels I get a code 99?
ANS: When ever you remove all 4 wheel sensors you will get a code 99. It may
not appear right at first and can go up to 200 miles before it turns the light
on and sets the code, but it will happen.
There are 2 things that can be done and both require removing the DIC.
One is to remove the light in the upper right hand corner of the DIC and the
other is to unplug the module. This can be done by using a hook to fish the
connector out to where you can unplug it.. The module is attach to the right
side of the speedo cluster and can be seen through the hole behind the DIC. It
has a pink wire and a black wire going to it, after 91 there is a third wire,
tan.
Thanks to Jerry Watts for this info.

QUESTION: It seems my Bilstein shocks
are leaking, does this mean they are bad?
ANS: Bilstein Gas Pressure Shock Absorbers, due to the extremely high
pressures exerted on the oil chamber, must use a seal which is extremely tight.
To prevent deterioration of this rod seal due to high temperatures and wear
resulting from the friction between the piston rod and seal, a self-lubricating
seal is used. By design, a small amount of the shock absorber oil is allowed to
pass by the seal onto the piston rod, thus creating a constant film of oil on
the rod. In fact, approximately 10% of the total oil capacity of the shock
absorber is intended for this purpose.
After long periods of service, this oil will create a film on the shock
absorber body. The appearance of this film of oil is normal and should not be
taken to indicate a defective Bilstein Shock Absorber. This gradual oil loss
will not affect the performance of the shock absorber over its service life.
Bilstein Gas Pressure MacPherson Strut Cartridges operate in a completely
unique manner compared to standard types. The large diameter, metal portion
visible inside the dust cover of an installed cartridge is actually the body of
the shock absorber, not the piston rod as on standard types. This part of the
Bilstein cartridge passes through sliding bearings thus requiring very high
quality grease between the sliding bearings inside the cartridge.
This grease
is, of course, picked up by the moving body chamber. The appearance of this
lubricant is normal, and in fact essential for the proper operation of the shock
absorber cartridge. This should not be misconstrued as oil on a piston shaft, as
is the case with the standard cartridge designs.
This also should serve to stress the importance of proper installation of the
supplied dust covers, as contamination of the lubricating grease by road dirt or
water will seriously affect the proper performance of the cartridge.
BILSTEIN CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Terry Kane
Technical Manager
Detroit Office
313-354-8181

QUESTION: Why is my clutch pedal at a
different height than my brake pedal?
ANS: About a month ago, I noticed the car was hard to shift, especially
getting into gear at rest.
Additionally, the car would start only with the
clutch pedal hard on the floor. At first, I suspected air in the system and
shortly thereafter I suspected a component problem in the hydraulic clutch
system. Anyway, though I read in the service manual that clutch pedal travel was
6.25 inches after measuring mine and finding it about four inches, having
nothing else to compare with, I decided such a disparity between actual and
specified was a misprint in the manual...after all, the pedal didn't look bent
and I verified there was nothing preventing the clutch pedal from coming up the
the 6.25 inch level. The fact that the car wouldn't start except with the clutch
was pushed real hard, ie: the clutch switch was not closing, should have been my
best clue that the manual was, in fact, correct and there was no problem with
air or components.
Once I had bled the system profusely, replaced the master and the slave, the
pedal was still low but the car was now shifting ok, but clutch engagement was
just off the floor...still not right. Obviously, there was some air in the
system but not enough that the system would have failed to work with proper
travel.
For the twelfth time, I slid the seat all the way back, put the tilt wheel up
and crawled in the foot well on my back. This time I just lay there with the
shop light studying the clutch pedal and thinking. I finally decided that the
pedal had to have been bent somehow, but where? As I looked up, I noted that the
pedal arm, makes an "s" bend about halfway up to the pivot. That is the only
place it could be bent such that the pedal is two inches lower than the brake.
I got 15 responses to my query about clutch pedal height. The interesting
thing was the wide disparity in heights. Only six cars, mostly 95s and 96s had
the pedals at the same height. The others were all over the place. I had five
with the clutch was higher and three with the clutch lower. The largest
disparity was one inch. Three cars has clutch pedals one inch *higher* than
their brakes.
My conclusions are that 89-up, C4 clutch pedals can bend and can do so fairly
easy. Those who have clutch pedals that sit more than one inch lower than the
brake, should pull the floor mat out and measure clutch pedal travel. If it is 5
inches or less, you could have a problem with clean clutch release and shifting
due to lack of pedal travel. You should first verify there is no problem in
interference due to wiring or other stuff snagging the pedal under the dash.
Then verify that the clutch master piston is coming all the way back and resting
against the retaining ring at the rear of the cylinder. If those tests are
passed, consider that your clutch pedal may be bent.
As for Barney the SLPT with a 4.5-in. pedal travel, the clutch pedal comes
out this week. I am sure it is nothing that a big damn pry bar and a vise will
not fix.
The next question is, how does a pedal get bent. Well, hydrolocking the
clutch system by mistake during bleeding didn't help, in fact, it twisted the
clutch pedal such that I have had it out once already to fix that. However, the
height problem was pre-existing. I suspect that, because I bought this car used
and I am familiar with its history, that a significant amount of aggressive
driving (i.e. pounding the clutch during quick shifts on the drag strip) in the
past may have bent the clutch pedal over time.
The clutch pedal bending over time is more evidence that one need consider
all sources of shift trouble before convicting the lubricant.
Lastly, this clutch pedal height survey along with my own experiences tells
me C4 owners can change the position of clutch engagement within a range of
maybe as much as two inches. I am sure a slight bending of my pedal such that
travel is 5-in. rather than 4.5 will reestablish enough travel for good
drivability. However, My legs are such that raising clutch travel back to 6.25
inches will be even better.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for this info.

QUESTION: I hear a lot about after
market brakes, how do they compare?
ANS: Product Comparison Table
|
Product Name:
|
BRKX2
|
Wilwood
|
Baer-Alcon
|
Baer-Alcon
|
Stock F.
|
BRKX2R
|
Stock R.
|
|
Disc Dia.
|
13.0
|
13.0
|
13.5
|
13.1
|
13.0
|
12
|
12
|
|
Disc Thickness
|
1.25
|
1.38
|
1.25
|
1.35
|
1.25
|
.88
|
.88
|
|
Piston Area
|
7.00
|
5.40
|
3.90
|
4.10
|
3.50
|
3.98
|
1.99
|
|
Piston Momt (A*R)
|
38.50
|
29.70
|
22.43
|
22.76
|
19.25
|
19.90
|
9.95
|
|
Pad Area
|
17.06
|
11.23
|
10.30
|
9.90
|
8.53
|
9.60
|
9.60
|
|
Pad Moment
|
93.83
|
61.77
|
59.23
|
54.95
|
46.92
|
46.92
|
46.92
|
|
Sum of Moments
|
132
|
91
|
82
|
78
|
66
|
68
|
34
|
|
Product of Momts
|
3612
|
1834
|
1328
|
1250
|
903
|
955
|
239
|
|
Caliper Length
|
11
|
10.7
|
9.9
|
9.9
|
5.5
|
8
|
4
|
|
Dust Seals
|
yes
|
no
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
|
Rattle Springs
|
yes
|
no
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
|
Finish
|
alum
|
black
|
black
|
black
|
alum
|
alum
|
alum
|
|
Installation
|
Bolt on
|
Extens
|
Averag
|
fair
|
Bolt on
|
Bolt on
|
Bolt on
|
|
Track Change
|
0
|
0.5
|
0
|
n/a
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Rear Setup
|
*
|
yes
|
none
|
yes
|
-
|
yes
|
-
|
Thanks to Jim Milstead for putting this info together.

QUESTION: Are head gaskets a problem
on the LT5?
ANS: The LT5 is prone to head gasket failure if allowed to get really hot.
This is because of the extremely small clearance between the coolant passage and
the combustion chamber at the lower side of the cylinder. Simple solution. Don't
run it hot (250+)
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this info.

QUESTION: Can the ZR-1 dual mass
flywheel be machined?
ANS: The dual mass flywheel can not be machined and this is mentioned quite
clearly in the service manual. The flywheel will have numerous blue spots and
other wear marks but if the surface is smooth and ungrooved, leave it alone.
Replacements are $800 and are un-necessary. These blue spots occur within a few
minutes of operation of a new clutch anyway.
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this info

QUESTION: I want to buy a ZR-1 but
I've heard so many stories about cost of parts and other issues?
ANS: Many new potential owners of ZR-1s have the same fears. They hear
stories about how expensive it is to repair a ZR-1 or actually the LT5 engine.
As it's true that the LT5 engine can be expensive to repair if you have a total
failure, it is also true that it is rare for these engines to have serious
problems. If for some reason you should have a blown LT5 engine you can get them
rebuilt at a cost from $10,000 to $20,000 depending on who does the work and
what needs to be done. Dealers may quote you $25,000 or more for a new engine
but you can find engines on the market for a lot less. If you are really going
to lose sleep over this than you should either walk away or try and find a late
model ZR-1 that is still under warranty.
Remember this is a limited production high performance automobile, less than
7,000 were built and one of the fastest production automobiles in the world.
Also remember that when you could buy a new ZR-1, sticker cost was $70,000.
Today you can buy used ZR-1's with very low mileage for as low as $30,000.
Parts availability and costs also seem to be another factor in the decision
making. Stories are that parts are hard to find and cost a lot. First remember
that 85% of the ZR-1 is the same as any C4 Corvette. The only thing different
about the ZR-1 is the engine, outside the body being wider and bigger tires. So
most parts are available and prices are very fair. It's when you get inside the
LT5 engine that prices get high and may be a little harder to find. But also
remember that many ZR-1 owners are having their engines modified to push more HP
and most of these cars are low mileage when they hit the performance shops. What
this means is there is a stock pile of low mileage used ZR-1 parts out on the
market.
Keep in mind you're not buying a mass production automobile. ZR-1's were
built for those people who wanted something unique and very fast. I promise you
that if you drive one you will want one. It's the best bang for the buck you can
buy today on the market. It's a car you can drive in traffic with the radio and
AC on and a car you can take straight to the track and beat the hell out of.
Like any car that is taken care of properly you will see a 100,000 miles and
more.
Believe me when I tell you most ZR-1 owners are not rich, we make payments
and sacrifice a lot to own these cars but to rephrase a famous saying, "they can
have my ZR-1 when they pry my cold dead fingers from around the keys!"

QUESTION: Bilstein shocks are
expensive to replace. Is there a way to rebuild them?
ANS: If anybody out there is thinking about purchasing new shocks for your
Corvette, you may want to think about having your factory Bilstein shocks
re-valved. {Most C4s came with Bilstein shocks from the factory} Bilstein will
rebuild/re-valve your shocks, per your instructions, for $55.00 per shock. The
turnaround time for the rebuild/re-valve service is about 2 weeks. This service
is performed at Bilstein in San Diego, CA. I too was flabbergasted by the dealer
price. Trying to find Bilstein products at retail (or a salesman with any
insight on performance shocks) was not easy. Bilstein has a web site at
"http://www.bilstein.com". Great information available in the motor sports
section on how to shock tune your chassis and trouble shooting the car on the
track. Bilstein has a complete dealer list available at the phone number listed
below. I have found the staff very pleasant and eager to help. They also sell
the Bilstein FX3 Controller, Slalom & Road Race chips, and front/rear actuators
for selective ride Corvettes.
Bilstein
8845 Renco Road
San Diego, CA 92121
619-453-7723
Fax 619-453-0770
http://www.bilstein.com
Thanks to Greg Moreland for the info.
ADDITIONAL INFO when dealing with FX3:
1. If you see multiple codes (more than 2), clear the codes and start over. I
suspect there is a software bug in the controller which causes the "all codes"
indication.
2. If you have to drive the car with a system fault, disconnect the indicated
actuator and manually adjust the affected shock to full firm because you might
have an actuator stuck in the soft position.
3. The replacement actuators are very pricey (try over $400, can you say
"gouging"?) from GM, but you can find them for $150 to $200 (new) from
Delco/Bilstein distributors. Direct from Bilstein costs more.
4. The FX-3 actuators are not rebuildable, but
5. Bilstein will continue to rebuild shocks for the foreseeable future at a much
lower cost than for new ones.
6. The code reader and manual sold by MidAmerica for about $90 was designed by
Gordon Killebrew and has proved to be a great addition to my tool supply, and it
now goes with me on every trip. It's almost as good as a shop manual, but
7. You really need a shop manual for the diagnostic trees.
8. Front actuators are a common part from 1989 thru 1995 as are the rears, but
front and rear are not interchangeable. The ZR-1 shares these parts with the
narrow car.
Thanks to Glenn Breitung for this update.

QUESTION: My ZR-1 stalls after a few
minutes or when it reaches 177 degrees?
ANS: One annoying problem I had that may be useful to someone, is that the car
would stall and not run after reaching 177 degrees on the temp gauge. The
problem was consistent and repeatable. As much as I hate instructions, I picked
up the service manual, and found the problem in about ten minutes. I found the
paragraph (under LT5- engine won't start) that said "At 176 degrees F, the
secondary fuel pump relay de-energizes" it kind of made me think....Hmm.. If the
primary fuel pump croaks, and the secondary pump doesn't run after 176 degrees,
then maybe that's the problem.. Fortunately, I had a spare fuel pump/ float
assembly laying around and the swap was made. I have never been so happy to see
the number 178 before. Summary....If you have a problem with your ZR dying after
it warms up (symptoms are the same as running out of gas) check and see if the
magic number where it dies is 177 degrees.
Thanks to Ed Simmons for this information.

QUESTION: What's in the '93-'95 owners
kit?
ANS: You receive a standard Corvette owners manual, Corvette flashlight,
Corvette pen and 2 1/2 x 3" Corvette note pad, LT5 power curve chart, standard
tire and warranty booklets, a black ZR-1 keychain in '93 owners kit (no key
chains in '94 or '95) and ZR-1 video that closely resembles
the base model version with "some" additional ZR-1 specific info in a leather
zippered case with Corvette and emblem in the center and bowtie and ZR-1
embossed
in the lower right corner.

QUESTION: Are the 6-speed transmissions
in the ZR-1 the same as in other 6-speed C4s?
ANS: No, the unit in ZR-1s is specific to the car and unlike those used behind
L98s, LT1s or LT4s. The difference is longer input shaft (~$550) and longer
guide tube (~$110). This conversion requires unit disassembly (~4 hours labor).
Also there are two different units (torque rating) used in the ZR-1: 1990-93 1/2
and 1993 1/25-95.

QUESTION: Are the roof panels stamped
with a VIN number?
ANS: Yes, the factory did start numbering the see thru roofs, because they were
a high thief item. Look on the left front corner of the frame, if it is an
original factory top it should have the same last 8 numbers as your vin number
on the dash.
Thanks to Jerry Watts for this info.

QUESTION: What is this ZR-1 "Black Motor
I hear about?
ANS: The Black Widow
Project
In December 1992, at the 40th Anniversary Corvette Show in
Palm Springs, California, Doug met Gary Cline the LT-5 Project Engineer for
MerCruiser. At first they chatted. Then, as the evening grew longer, they
started talking about ideas. Rippie listened and thought. He asked, "Whatta you
think?" and "What if?" more than a few times. They agreed that the best idea of
all would be to do more than talk.
"I think anyone who’s tops in his field wants to see what he’s created be all
it can be," says Rippie. Cline, other MerCruiser LT-5 project engineers, and
Lotus engineers who were involved in the project knew their engine was capable
of higher performance than it had powering the ZR-1 Corvette. Doug Rippie was a
kindred spirit. It was decided to work with him to produce a special LT-5
engine, the DRZ-500, also known as the "Black Engine" because each of the
DRZ-500 engines produced was painted with special black paint and the "Black
Widow" engine, from the nickname given by Jim Van Dorn to the eight DRM-converted
ZR-1 Corvettes that are powered by DRZ-500 engines, one of which he owns.
The DRZ-500 engine resulted
from the cooperative effort of Rippie, Cline and other MerCruiser engineers,
Graham Behm of Lotus Engineering in England and Tim Holland of Lotus Engineering
USA, and Chevrolet’s blessing. There were four versions:
405
horsepower DRZ-500s, 1990-92 model LT-5s updated to 1993 specifications
450 horsepower DRZ-500s, 1993 LT-5s, 50-state-legal
475 horsepower DRZ-500s, 50-state-legal
525 horsepower DRZ-500, a full race version
Special precision machining and porting, camshaft installation, and black
painting was done at MerCruiser. DRM did the disassembly and assembly as well as
calibration and emissions certification. There were only eight DRZ-500 engines
produced, between March and July 1993, because production of the LT-5 was due to
end in November of that year and time ran out to produce more than eight.
The "Black Widow" ZR-1 s powered by DRZ-500 engines are more than just an
examples of why Rippie and his small band of midnight oil-burners are capable of
producing. They formed a bridge between the race track and the street for DRM.
High performance to Rippie is not only high horsepower. It is a finely balanced
combination of power, handling and braking. To match the power of the DRZ-500,
Rippie could do nothing less than develop suspension and brake packages for the
ZR-1 Corvette with equally outstanding performance characteristics. The results,
rave reviews by everybody who’s driven one converted by DRM to be a "Black
Widow."
Thanks to Doug Rippie for this info.
Total qty was 8:
| Car Number |
YEAR |
COLOR |
VIN # |
ORIGINAL OWNER |
LAST OWNER |
OPTIONS |
|
1 |
1991 |
White/Steel Blue |
843 |
Dave Harrington |
- |
4.09, CAB, Ron Davis Radiator, Borla Challenge exhaust, 1g coilovers.
475hp |
| 2 |
1991 |
Black/Black |
757 |
Steve Wait |
George Crouse |
ForgeLine RS wheels, roll bar, Centerforce clutch, lightweight
flywheel, DRM 1g coilovers and Short stop brakes.
Only
525hp full race car. |
| 3 |
1990 |
Black/Black |
83 |
Glen
Greider |
- |
NOS, Centerforce clutch, upgraded brakes, poly bushings & heim
joints, heavier sway bars, 4.09, heavy duty radiator, lowered. Hood
signed by gang at MerCruiser. 465hp + 130hp NOS. |
| 4 |
1993 |
Ruby/Ruby |
153 |
Jerry Crews |
Frank Kafoure |
Polish Wheels. 475hp |
| 5 |
1991 |
Black/Black |
|
John Whitney |
- |
Roll bar, coilovers, Brembo brakes, Fikse wheels, 4.09, Forced
Air induction, 3" exhaust. Lighter by 350lbs. 501hp |
| 6 |
1992 |
Red/Black |
409 |
Dr. Michael Jackson |
Eric Brown |
1g coilovers, 4.09, upgraded audio. |
| 7 |
1993 |
Aqua/Gray |
|
Mark Schultz |
- |
|
| 8 |
1991 |
White/Gray |
1119 |
Jim VanDorn |
- |
Ton of options. 475hp |
NOTE:
One last widow engine:
| Our Street Skinner package
is based on the same principles used in the black motors of old. During
the course of the engine enhancement of our own Mr. [Doug] Johnson's
beat up old '90 ZR-1, I had the occasion to speak to a member of the
original LT5 gang. In that conversation, I asked if there happened to be
any remnants of that old black powder paint left laying around. As luck
may have it, a small amount of that very same powder was found. Enough
to do just one more engine...
Mr Johnson was the owner of the
last "black" LT5 engine to come from within MerCruiser.
Currently this car is owned by Bill
Strowbridge. |
Thanks to Jim VanDorn for this info.

QUESTION: I understand a second design
head was introduced in late production engines?
ANS: The latest two head designs had recast pockets for providing better oil
retention for the cam timing chains. This reduced even further the possibility
of chain rattling during startup, providing better dry start lubrication,
especially after long periods of the engine not running. These heads were are
referenced as the "A.L. Dunn Cylinder Head, First Design and Second Design" (
The latest Second Design Lotus Part Number was 550.4005.878A-RH and
550.4005.877A-LH) These second design heads were a design year change occurring
sometime just before the final '95 designated engines were completed. The model
year change specification documents were "ECH=3D 550.2680; MY=3D95A;
ECA=3D1.0285". These heads did not include the CNC machining of the port runners
when installed on the motors. The improved port matching technique was the same
as the first design heads. GM's part numbers are 10228866-RH and 10228865-LH
(Service part numbers are 10168655-RH and 10168654-LH. These are the numbers
used internally for the construction of the motor).
The first design Dunn head included the CNC machining and better port matching
technique to the manifold for '93-'95 applications, and also the revised oil
retention pocket.
Again, the second design heads did not have CNC machined runners, and the
casting walls were thicker. GM argued there was very little difference in flow
rates between the cast runner and CNC machined runner sets of heads. Most of the
horsepower increase in stock applications, anyway, was supposed to be from
better port matching. When replacing heads, GM may inadvertently send one of
each rather than a matched pair, i.e., both machined or both cast runner. These
heads are not uniquely distinguished by GM part number, so be careful when you
buy to at least check for comparable runner treatment. The second design Dunn
head is not uniquely part numbered from the first.
Note: the thicker casting
walls on the second design heads might be advantageous for machining out to even
greater flow rates than achievable with any of the other head designs?
The high flow head work done early on by the fellows at Mercury consisted of
refinements on the cast runners and port matching done by hand. From this work,
patterns were developed for the horsepower bump work marketed through the
rebuilders. This early modification work was all subcontracted to the two
fellows at Mercury, Scott Skinner and another fellow named Greg ( I can't find
his last name), returned and then installed on customer motors.
Thanks to Mark Broin for the above information.
Additional info: You can check your 1995 ZR-1 to see if it has A. L. Dunn heads
by looking at the side (near the front) of the passenger side head (look in with
light just beside the right front shock, high on the side of the head). If the
plate covering the cam tensioner has three black bolts ... two on top about 1
1/2 inches apart and one on the bottom you have A. L. Dunn heads. Birmal heads
have two bolts, one on top and one on the bottom.
Thanks to Paul Dehnert for the info.

QUESTION: How come you can't buy just
the cam covers without the heads?
ANS: One reason LT5 cam covers are not available separately is that there are no
cam bearings in an LT5. The cams ride directly on the head and cam cover
material which, of course, is aluminum.
To set the cam bearing clearance, the cam covers were torqued to the head then
align bored by MerCruiser on very special equipment designed and built
specifically for that process. Because of the length of the bores, alignment and
bearing clearance is very critical.
Thus, one can not simply change cam covers because the new cover will not be
align bored to match the head.
This is why cam covers come with heads.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for this info.

QUESTION: How does one pop out the
opening to the non functioning exhaust outlet in an early stock ZR-1?
ANS: The production Corvette mufflers with two "tailpipes" on each side are
actually designed as single tailpipe mufflers. The dummy tailpipes are the
result of Styling's wet dream. We have told them many times that if they put two
tailpipes on a muffler it will cost us power if we make them both active. While
I'm sure this isn't obvious to someone outside the business, the reason is
simple: we have to pass the same noise laws regardless what the exhaust system
look like. If we give up volume inside the muffler to create an additional
exhaust path, we have to restrict the flow internally to have the same noise
level as measured by the required tests.
So, the pipes you see with "disks" blocking them are not blocked at all; they
are strictly dummy tailpipes welded to the ends of the muffler. The small bleed
holes in the muffler shell were a compromise to let a little bit of exhaust out
so they appear to be working. (Note: this applies to all production Corvette
mufflers, not just ZR1s.)
If you drill through the muffler shell at the base of the dummy pipes, you will
effectively destroy the primary tuner which resides in that part of the muffler.
you won't like the result. It will create a strong "boom" between 1200 and 1800
RPM that's a real headache producer. Further, you won't improve the performance.
Thanks to Jim Ingle for this info.

QUESTION: When do the secondaries open
on a ZR-1?
ANS: The secondary port throttle strategy on the LT5 is that on all model years
prior to 93 the secondary port throttles will open at all RPMS at WOT, the 93
and later cars will not open even at WOT until the engine RPM is at or above
1500. The reason for this is that the 93 engine actually makes more torque on 8
injectors at the lower RPM'S than on 16 injectors. This was largely due to the
revisions which were incorporated in the intake ports to aid airflow. This
actually led to a slowing down of the air charge in the secondary port. The use
of a more radical camshaft on the secondary profile is perfectly feasible and
several engines have been modified in this manner and do show significant gains,
however the use of longer durations typically leads to a reduction in the bottom
end torque so this configuration would probably be best suited to later opening
of the secondaries, ie keep on 8 injectors until the two torque curves cross.
Thanks to Graham Behan for this info.

QUESTION: I'm seeing a loss of platinum
pads from my spark plugs?
ANS: Let me attempt to clear the air on the 41-907/41-913 issue with the ZR1
community. By the way, please pass along info as to the member composition of
"Team ZR1". Please distribute as you see fit.
After the 907/913 discussion, I need to explain a few things about the AC
long-life design families and their evolution. I also would like to describe the
failure mechanism at work when a platinum wear element is lost from an
electrode.
The 41-907 and the 41-913 are identical designs except that the 907 (original
equipment) has the addition of topical compounds for anti-seize and anti-stick
benefits. A graphite based anti-seize compound using an alcohol carrier was
added to the thread body of the 907. Commercially known as "DAG", this compound
was selected based on its' anti-seizing capabilities, minimal influence on
installed torque vs. shell stretch interactions, and processing concerns. The
insulator butt of the 907 was coated to reduce the potential for the silicone
boot to stick to the glazed insulator butt. This compound was a Teflon polymer
commercially known as Vydax and was supplied by 3M. Both of these compounds were
removed from service plugs because of non-synchronous processing requirements
and environmental/health concerns.
The 907 and 913 designs were from a family known as the "Dual Pad" family. This
means that both electrodes had disc-type platinum wear elements welded to them.
While these early 100,000 mile designs were very erosion resistant, their
electric field characteristics were not optimal.
In 1996 and later production a new design family known as "Hi-Efficiency" was
released. These designs addressed some of the shortcomings of the Dual Pad
family in that fine-wire platinum elements were attached to the center
electrodes to improve electric field and combustion characteristics. Some
designs included a fine-wire element welded to the sidewire as well. Both
variants included a larger cross-section side wire material with a larger bend
radius (to reduce the overall length of the wire) resulting in reduced operating
temperatures of the wire.
Which brings us to the dominant failure mode of the platinum to inconel
interface. Basically, the weld junction fails from thermal fatigue. Reducing the
peak temperatures, the rate of temperature change, and the number of thermal
cycles all are keys to retaining the platinum element(s). The shorter, heavier
side wire of the HE plugs runs cooler and is more stable than the lighter, longer
wire used on the Dual Pad series. Centerwire temperatures increase with
insulator temperatures; meaning that the center wires of "colder" plugs run
cooler than those of "hotter" plugs in a given application. In general, higher
specific output engines with higher BMEPs result in higher spark plug operating
temperatures. Therefore, a colder platinum plug of any design family is more
likely to retain the center electrode platinum element longer than a hotter plug
will.
All of this leads me to make a recommendation for a service plug (unofficially
at this time) for the LT5; the 41-950 AC (service package #25312442). This is an
HE design used in the Northstar. It has a .050" gap (which should be retained),
"2" heat range (same insulator as the 907/913), and a very durable resistor of a
tighter specification. This is an excellent product with performance
characteristics that are unsurpassed in the industry. There is, however, one
caution. Since the plug is no colder than the original, the center electrode
operating temperatures are the same. If the 1.0 mm fine wire platinum element of
the center electrode is lost due to thermal fatigue the spark gap will open to
.090". Demand voltage of this gap will exceed the voltage available from the
coil resulting in misfire. The present solution would be a colder HE plug, but
AC does not offer such a plug to the service community. A future (one year?)
electrode design will offer a solution to this problem.
In general use, ZR1 owners no doubt change their plugs long before they've worn
out. Owners exercising their vehicle in a performance environment may be better
served by using a non-platinum design and "clipping" the side wires to 50% center
electrode coverage to improve e-field characteristics or using a design having
"trimmed" electrodes to start with, like the AC RapidFire product. Non-platinum
plugs are available in both tapered and flat seat families in the "2" heat range
grade in both standard and RapidFire designs. The R42LTS or #8 RapidFire designs
are both "2" heat range plugs having tapered seats. The FR2LS and #5 RapidFire
"2" heat range and the FR1LS and #9 RapidFire "1" heat range offer flat seat
options. I would gap any of these plugs at .042" - .045", always using a pin
type gauge.
Additionally, always remember these three things when installing new plugs:
1) Gap is important!
2) Installation torque is critical for proper heat dissipation. Tapered seat
plugs should be installed at 11-15 lbs/ft and flat seats at 18-22 lbs/ft in cold
aluminum cylinder heads. Reduce these specs by 30-35% if using a light coating
of nickel or copper based anti-seize compounds.
3) A light coating of silicone grease inside the spark plug boot will increase
the protection against arcing over (flashover).
Thanks to Mark Weaver of Delphi Spark Plug Engrg for this info.

QUESTION: EPROM & Learning Procedure
ANS: Learning Ability:
"The system has a "learning" ability which allows it to make corrections for
minor variations in the fuel system to improve drivability. If the battery is
disconnected, to clear diagnostic trouble codes or for other repair, the
"learning" process resets and begins again. A change may be noted in the
vehicle's performance. To "teach" the vehicle, ensure that the engine is at
operating temperature. The vehicle should be driven at part throttle, with
moderate acceleration and idle conditions until normal performance returns."
Clearing Diagnostic Trouble Codes:
"To clear any Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) from the memory, either to determine
if the malfunction will occur again or because repair has been completed, power
feed must be disconnected for at least thirty (30) seconds." (Note: If this mode
is used to clear a DTC.)
"Depending on how the vehicle is equipped, the system power feed can de
disconnected at the positive battery terminal "pigtail," or the inline
fuse holder that originates at the positive connection at the battery. (The
negative battery terminal may be disconnected, but other on-board memory data,
such as preset radio tuning, will also be lost.)"
"NOTICE: To prevent system damage, the (ignition) key must be "OFF" when
disconnecting or reconnecting power."
The above is from the service manual. The procedure serves much the same purpose
as rebooting a computer to (re)initialize the system firmware's software
parameters. This should be accomplished, as an example, whenever an EPROM is
replaced. The battery should be disconnected prior to replacing an EPROM or
other electronic components; one reason, amongst others, is that the EPROM, like
other electronic components, is an ESDS component subject to electro-static
discharge. Under certain climatic conditions, I use a wrist grounding strap when
handling ESDS components.
Contrary to others, changing an EPROM is not a 5-minute procedure if done
correctly and completely. Prior to repair, replacing the EPROM in this instance,
I use a diagnostic grounding tool to interrogate the CCM/ECM for the presence of
current or history DTCs as these codes, if present, will be lost when the
battery is disconnected. I also use a scanner to determine/compare other engine
management parameters before and after replacement of the EPROM.
I also plan to drive the vehicle to implement the "relearn" procedure
immediately following the repair while the engine is at normal operating
temperature; as such, as the first step, the engine is started and brought to
normal operating temperature prior to disconnecting the battery. The second step
is to remove the ignition key and disconnect the battery.
Next, remove and replace the EPROM taking care to ensure that it is evenly and
completely seated and that the retainer clip on each end of the receptacle is
returned to "lock" position. Once the EPROM is replaced, reconnect the battery
and restart the vehicle. The A/C will default to "ON" upon restart; turn it
"OFF," and also enable the secondary injectors (power key "ON"). While at idle,
monitor all gauges and the DIC for "NORMAL" operation and allow the engine to
again reach normal operating temperature.
Next, the vehicle should, as the service manual states, be driven at part
throttle, with moderate acceleration and idle conditions until normal
performance returns. Avoiding traffic congested areas, I drive about 30-45
minutes alternating between periods of moderate acceleration, using 1st through
4th gears, and periods of idle to complete the learning procedure. It is not
necessary to test the rev limiter. Finally, I again interrogate the CCM/ECM for
the presence of current or history DTCs, and scan the engine's management
parameters for a before/after comparison.
Thanks to Bruce Wolfe for this information.

QUESTION: Are the "power keys" special
or coded for each ZR-1?
ANS: The Power Keys for the ZR-1 are not special or unique to each ZR-1 (except
for the 1990 ZR-1). All '90s will work with all other '90's and all '91's thru
'95's will work with each other. For some reason the 1990 is different, maybe
keyed different then all the other ZR-1 years.
The part numbers are as follows:
1990 part number 12505009.
1991 - 1995 part number 12508275.
Also for some reason the 1990 key is twice the price of the '91 thru '95 keys.

QUESTION: Can I put Dex-Cool in my
ZR-1?
ANS: This is a letter from Ron Moser and in the October issue of Motor Trend
should help.
November 9, 1998
Don L. Parrish
Automotive Advertising
Petersen Publishing
6420 Willshire Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048-5515
Dear Don:
This letter is to comment on the coolant article in the October issue of
Motor Trend.
The article is an excellent article on coolants and especially in
informing people or the extended life coolants.
However, I need to point out a misinterpretation. On the bottom of the
1st column on page 145 it states that "On '93 and older GM models, use
of this antifreeze is discouraged because its chemical ingredients can
interact with the copper-soldered joints inside the radiator."
Havoline Extended Life Antifreeze DEX-COOL can be used in any car
including 93 and earlier model GM cars without any problems.
It is true that some older GM cars used a high lead solder in copper
brass radiators where their newer cars are all aluminum. However,
Havoline Extended Life Antifreeze DEX-COOL protects the high lead
solder very well, there is no detrimental interaction with the solder
or radiator, and there is no need to be concerned. Indeed, although GM
decided to be conservative initially in not recommending DEX-COOL for
all older cars, Texaco has recommended Havoline DEX-COOL for ALL
cars, and stands behind the product in ALL cars.
Prestone Extended Life Coolant does NOT meet DEX-COOL requirements, and
does not have DEX-COOL approval. Showing Prestone and Havoline ELCs
together and putting them in same paragraph, without explaining that
they are significantly different, is not a service to your readers.
Havoline DEX-COOL is put in all GM cars and the warranty is 5
years/150,000 miles. However, Prestone ELC can NOT be put in any GM
car without reducing the warranty to 2 years 30,000 miles.
If you would like further information, please write or call me at
713/752-3246.
Yours truly,
Ron Moser/RAA
Thanks to Al Kindler for this info.
Additional info on this subject from Hib Halverson:
I had started last month to research this subject at GM.
The first source told me that the reason the disclaimer about pre-94 vehicles
was put on the packaging of GM-branded Dex-Cool, was that GM has some
theoretical engineering data that said some of the components of the Dex-Cool
anticorrosive chemical package might not be friendly to the silver solder used
to manufacturer copper brass radiators. What's funny about that is that Corvette
has not used a copper-brass radiator since 1982 and in other GM lines the copper
brass radiators are long gone.
Anyway, this guy went on to say that testing work is underway now, but that
started after the aftermarket version of Dex-Cool was introduced as both
GM-branded and Texaco-branded products, seems to show that any damage to
copper-brass radiators, if it occurs, would only happen after a time in service
far longer than virtually any car would run--he threw out numbers of
half-a-million miles or more.
Now, the one thing you must be cognizant of when using Dex-Cool in a cooling
system previously filled with any coolant using a silicate-based anticorrosive
package---which means all antifreezes other than Dex-Cool--and that is the
silicate-based chemicals coat the inside of the system with a silicate "scale"
that seals and protects the system. Some things in Dex-Cool, particularly the
chemicals that give Dex-Cool the 5yr/50,000 mile service life factory- or
fresh-fill applications, are partially degraded by the silicate-coating. Thus,
when you change coolant in an engine previously filled with an antifreeze having
a silicate-based anticorrosive formula, you cannot get Dex-Cool's long life. I
believe GM says you can run it 2yrs/24000 miles.
I was told by another person at GM who works with coolants that a number of
flushes with straight water can remove a lot of the silicate coating but he also
said that these flushes must be accompanied by running the car awhile with
straight water.
Bottom line on Dex-Cool is that, in engines previously filled with coolants
using an antifreeze having a silicate-based anticorrosive package, it is best to
use a 2-3 yr/24,000-36,000 mi. change schedule. Even though the change schedule
is not as good as the factory-fill situations, that Dex-Cool is much more easy
on the water pump seals makes it worth the change.

QUESTION: What about oil break in for
'90-'92 ZR-1s vs '93-'95 ZR-1s?
ANS: The 90-92 engines were designed to be "run in" and operated with standard
10W30 high quality oil. The piston ring material is different from the 90-92
engines, but not the sole reason why the '93-'95 engines were shipped with and
run with synthetic oil.
From Graham Behan:
"The tangential force of the oil ring changed (in '93), we always had an
asymmetric barrel top and a tapered second made by Goetze from their F14 cast
iron material. Once again no changes were made specifically for the change in
oil (synthetic oil). Typically the engine does not reach stabilized oil economy
for up to 25000 miles. By the way the tangential force of the oil control ring
was actually lower on some 93 & later engines."

QUESTION: Why does the LT5 engine have
two different PCV valves?
ANS: Well as in most of the stories from the early days of development it is a
long'ish one. Yes the system is the way it is based partially on cost. The fresh
air recirculation type of system utilizing PCV'S was the way that most GM
products were and the way that the LT5 was specified. The problems with this
were that with the LT5'S relatively high output coupled with the lack of
internal crankcase volume the requirements for the PCV system was very different
from the norm . The engine exhibits very different characteristics at part
load/no load than it does at WOT, this is true of most engines but the massive
blowby at no load required a very different PCV characteristic than the WOT
condition. During the development process Allan Nobbs, of Lotus, came up with a
variable orifice PCV valve which was well suited to the large changes in the
engine. Well after the design was shown at one of our many vendor meetings it
was decided that tooling a completely different valve was not on, so the system
was changed to the current spec, using two valves with differing characteristics
in an attempt to establish a good compromise. We can all see the results, the
system actually exhibits reverse flow at WOT.
I wonder if there is an alternative that would work better?
One other way is to eliminate the fresh air recirculation and use an orifice
controlled system. This method shows good crankcase depression under most engine
operating conditions.
Thanks to Graham Behan for this information.

QUESTION: I've heard that early
ZR-1, 90-92, exhaust manifold were better than later model, 93-95, manifolds?
ANS: For some time there has been a little confusion and a little controversy
over which stock exhaust manifolds are better for power, the '90-'92's or
the '93-'95's. This is probably because it is an established fact that some
of the nominal power increase for the '93 MY was achieved through an
improved exhaust system. Intuition suggests that the manifolds have
something to do with it. The fact of the matter is, that the '93-'95
manifolds cause a loss of about 3 to 4 horsepower. This info was brought to
us a while back by Graham Behan. The power gains from the exhaust system
result from changes that were made to the mufflers. Graham was the release
engineer for the '93 MY upgrades.
As was explained, the late model manifolds include a feature that addressed a
potential problem. It was discovered that a catastrophic failure of the ceramic
element in the catalyst could lead to serious engine damage if the engine
ingested ceramic debris from the cats. A restriction was purposely placed in the
manifold as a safety measure. I have often wondered what form this restriction
took.
Over the weekend, I removed my '93 manifolds in the course of installing
headers. Once the heat shields were removed, the restriction became apparent.
The manifolds are a tri-y design. The collector tube is 3" in diameter. Where
the tube enters the catalyst chamber there is a 1/2" deep dent across the tube.
Apparently this pinch in the exhaust flow causes a venturi effect that prevents
loose material from traveling upstream.
Thanks to Marc Haibeck for this info.

QUESTION: Can the starter in a ZR-1
be rebuilt?
A starter rebuild is pretty straight forward. The procedure is disassemble,
clean everything, bead blast, if possible. Brushes generally do not need
replacement, however, they can be obtained from Jap starter rebuilders. The 2
bearings for the armature are NSK 6000D and NSK 6200DW. The 2 large bearings in
the main case are Fafnair 9104PP. Try to use a waterproof grease on the gears.
Paint is Krylon #1613 semi flat black.
Thanks to Vicky E. Robinson for this info.

QUESTION: What is the best way to
jack up a ZR-1?
ANS: Do not jack a C4 at the center of its side frames. If you do, the biggest
risk is cracking the front glass.
There are only two places to properly lift a C4 with a floor jack.
At the front, you lift on the cross member just ahead of the engine. It is best
to use a block of wood (4x6x1.5 works best) on the jack pad. Many C4s will have
to have their front wheels driven up on blocks (12x2x2 works good) to get the
jack under the car. Once you're up on the blocks, turn the wheels to full lock
and come in with the floor jack behind whichever tire is turned in. Only floor
jacks with long, low frames typical of 2-ton jacks will be able to do this. It
works very well if you have the right floor jack and a block of wood.
You also can come in from the front with the floor jack but then the blocks you
drive the front up on must be much higher.
At the rear, you need the "Jack-a-Vette" tool. It bolts to the jack pad and its
vertical leg goes between the exhaust pipes and lifts on the rear axle housing.
This method is not documented in the factory service manual but had been used in
the service trade for many years and, according to the makers of Jack-a-Vette,
was used at Bowling Green during the C4 era. On cars that are lower than stock,
the rear may have to be driven up on blocks to allow enough room to get the
floor jack and Jack-a-Vette underneath.
To support a C4 on jack stands, place the stands on either side at the front
right where the frame turns inward behind the front wheels. At the rear support
the areas of the frame just ahead of the rear wheels. In all cases, I use small
blocks on the jack stand pads. Take extreme care to avoid crushing fuel or brake
lines.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for this info.

QUESTION: What's the story on the
Birmel vs Dunn heads on later model ZR-1's?
ANS: All the engines were produced substantially before the 1995 and about 1/3
the way into the 1994 production periods (i.e.., Fall of 1993). The motors were
stored at the plant and assembled into the cars by some methodology known only
to the guys who brought them to the line. There is no guarantee the last 1995
cars built got the latest engines built, or that some of those engines may not
have found their way into earlier serial number cars. Also, some motors went to
SPO for replacement or sale requests while cars were being built. As we all
know, many other engines made their way into the public's hands.
So, the only way to determine if a car has A.L. Dunn heads, is to be able to
recognize them when you examine the car. Vehicle production S/N is no guarantee.
To see if you have Dunn heads using a mirror look for a triangular shaped
tensioner cover on the passenger side heads with 3 bolts and a center adjuster
that lies under the cam cover. Look for a little casting mark with a mirror just
under the cam covers of A.L. Dunn heads - left of the dipstick as you look
through the wheel well on the passenger side. You will see a sort of rolling
scroll (a similar font is bauhaus 93 if you look in WORD or AOL) that reads
"dunn" in all small letters; and then what appears to be an "l" on the left side
head, and an "r" on the right side head. The Dunn casting mark is also present
on the driver's side in about the same position.
Also, it is possible to get one head of each design from SPO if you order a
replacement pair. They don't open the boxes when the heads are shipped to see if
the surfaces are machined or cast. There is also no part number difference
between the two heads. GM's rationalization is there is no performance
difference.
Thanks to Mark Broin for this info.

QUESTION: Why do I see oil in the
plenum area?
ANS: The breather system of the LT5 is certainly not one of the LT5's strong
points, stories from the dark early days of development were akin to the
striking of an oil deposit for the first time. There were many strange
contraptions which were intended to keep the LT5's running, one of which was a
four inch diameter tube connected to the oil filler cap, which when under wide
open throttle, a column of oil would raise three feet into the air, since this
would have been a severe packaging problem other solutions were sought for the
vehicle. Basically there is insufficient crankcase volume and the system which
exists is a serious compromise. So all LT5 engines carry a small amount of oil
through the breather and it is perfectly normal to see oil in the plenum. With
increasing blow by this situation will get worse, but typically not enough to
cause detonation problems. In most race applications we recommended running a
quart over full to minimize the effects of oil surge. Basically don't worry it
typically isn't that bad.
Thanks to Graham Behan for this info.

QUESTION: Are there any
durability differences between the 2 bolt '90 - '92 LT5 engines and the 4 bolt
'93 - '95 LT5 engines?
ANS: For 90-92 production engines the durability target was 200 hours of GM's
Corporate Durability test cycle, which consisted of cycling the engine between
peak torque and peak horsepower rpm at WOT, with a 2.5 minute ramp up and down
between the two speeds. For the 1993 and up engines the requirement was 400
hours on the same cycle. The biggest single improvement from the 4 bolt blocks
was actually a process upgrade made at Central Foundry which eliminated porosity
in the main bearing webs. When Lotus actually started to run the first 4 bolts,
with cases from Dennison Foundry, they split up the # 2 & 4 main bearing webs.
When Dennison went chapter 11 they moved to Central Foundry and reaped the
benefits of better process control leading to less gas entrapment.
Thanks to Graham Behan for this info.

QUESTION: How do I replace the
battery in my ZR-1?
ANS: 1. Turn ignition switch on (without starting engine) and turn wheels fully
to the left (as though you are making a left turn). This will provide plenty of
clearance to the torx fasteners at the rear of the left front wheel well. Once
wheels are turned, shut ignition off and remove key.
2. Using a T30 torx head wrench, remove the top three fasteners at the rear of
the left front wheel well liner. These are located just in front of the left
front fender at the outer side of the wheel well liner.
3. Using a 10mm socket, remove the bolt at the rear and top of the fender. You
can now carefully "tilt" the fender panel outward.
4. To provide additional clearance for the fender, use an open faced 10mm wrench
and loosen the bolt at the bottom of the fender. There is a narrow slot through
which you can insert the wrench. I small flashlight is helpful in seeing this
bolt. Since the bolt is upside down, make sure you turn it in the correct
direction to loosen and later re-tighten it. Once you have loosened this bolt a
few rotations (without removing it), you can now tilt the fender outward enough
to have plenty of clearance to lift out the old battery.
5. Using a 13mm socket, remove the battery hold down clamp located at the bottom
middle at the rearward-facing side of the battery. There is pretty tight
clearance on this, and I had the best results using an 8 inch 1/4" socket
extension bar, approaching the hold down bolt from the top.
6. Disconnect the cables from the battery using the correct size metric socket
8mm. Remove the negative cable first, which is the outward cable, followed by
the positive terminal cable.
7. Once the cables are disconnected, carefully lift the outward side of the
battery slightly upward to lift it above the retaining nubs in the battery tray
(in other words, you can't just slide it straight out). Once you have cleared
the battery tray, you can now lift out the old battery.
8. Remove the battery insulation sleeve from the old battery and transfer it to
the new battery (AC Delco 75-7YR).
9. Lift new battery onto the battery tray and slide it inward into place. There
are some wires running down the back which are very tight clearance to the
battery, so make sure you hold these rearward while sliding the battery in so
that don't catch the battery insulation.
10. Reinstall the hold-down clamp.
11. Connect the negative battery cable.
12. Connect the positive battery cable.
13. Lift the fender panel back into position and just start to thread the top
10mm bolt.
14 Reinstall the three T30 torx fasteners in the wheels well splash panel. Make
sure the fender panel is aligned correctly so there will be no interference with
the driver's side door's range of motion.
15. Tighten the top 10mm bolt with the fender panel in correct alignment.
16. Tighten the bottom 10mm bolt.
17. Start car and be happy again ;-)
A couple of notes. On my car, the battery was definitely dead. The engine fired
right up with the new battery. Also, the correct AC Delco replacement battery
(75-7YR) has the condition "window" located on the wrong side (near the positive
terminal), so it is not visible once the battery is installed.
Thanks to Steve Castle for writing this up.

QUESTION: What is the difference
between each year?
ANS: CHANGES AND REFINEMENTS FROM 1990 to 1995 ZR-1 / LT5 CORVETTES
1990
EXTERIOR
1) The
first year front end had the same body design as the base Corvette with the
distinctive black rub strip that encircled the car sporting the “TUNED PORT
INJECTION” wording indents. The 3-inches-wider than base Corvette rear had
a new, dynamic convex shape and all new "square" tail lights that were only
available on a ZR1. The center high mounted stop light would continue as a ZR-1
exclusive through 1995 even though the 1991 base Corvette assumed the rear
convex identity of the King of The Hill.
But only for the ZR1, did it include widening of the doors, rear
quarters, rocker panels, rear fascia, and rear upper panel. Two black 1-1/2 spacers are noticeable on
either side of the license plate, between the back up lights. It is difficult to notice the 0.9” difference
in length between the ZR-1 and base Corvette.
The 3465 pound weight of the ZR1 is 236 more than the coupe. The ZR-1 purple tint solar-block windshield is
slightly different from the base car with a larger, clear opening for
"electronic garage door openers". The 1990 front and rear emblem has a Black
Ring and the right hand side "Bowtie" background is Red with a Black "Bowtie"
outline - Gold filled. (same as 1984-1990).
2) In the books All Corvettes are Red, and The Heart of The
Beast, there is mention that 10 or 12 ZR-1 narrow body convertible Spyders
were built. Some had DR-1 on the license plate in honor of Don Runkle, the LT5
chief engineer. He was presented with a silver ZR-1
convertible with yellow interior built by ASC and Chevrolet at
Bowling Green.
3)
Mid-year exterior color introductions were: Medium Quasar Blue Metallic,
Turquoise Metallic, and Yellow. These
colors do not appear in the 1990 dealer catalogs.
INTERIOR
Leather Sport seats
with 2 lumbar controls, one on each side of the seating surface.
DRIVETRAIN
1) The ZR-1 engine,
designated LT5, is all aluminum for the block and cylinder heads, has 4 overhead
camshafts, 32 valves, and is a 350 cubic inch V8. The HP rating was 375 at 370 ft lbs of torque
from 1990-1992 and 405hp at 385 ft lbs of torque from 1993-1995.
2) Trans gear
ratios: 2.68 / 1.80 / 1.31 / 1.00 / 0.75 / 0.50 : Reverse = 2.50 : [610 (Nm) /
450 ftlb. torque capacity]
3) The 1990 – 1992’s
used one piece exhaust manifold/cat assemblies.
4) From the start of
production in 1988 (MY89) to 01/01/89, all
6-speeds had a 3.54 axle. After 01/01/89
the ZR-1’s received a 3.45 axle.
5) As stated in the
dealer catalog and ZR1 owner’s kit book, the 1 to 4 lockout (CAGS) on the
6-speed transmission was part of a strategy for meeting E.P.A. fuel economy
requirements. 1990 through 1994 requirements included the
following: Coolant temp: at least 120 degrees; M.P.H. - 12 to 19; Throttle Angle
- Less than 35%.
6) A few of the
first 1990's sported steel half shafts while later production was aluminum. The
half-shaft was changed during the 1990 model starting with VIN # 800621. Known VIN #’s = 208 / 410 /
7) The early 1990
LT5 engines prior to VIN #913 came with "screw worm drive" radiator hose clamps. These were changed to "spring type" later in
the Model Year to correct a possible coolant leak problem at the radiator hose
attachments due to torque loss.
A new Service Kit P/N 10157951 became available which included 6 new
radiator hoses and 12 new "spring type" hose clamps to correct this potential
problem. Known ZR1NET member VIN#’s = #357 / #410
8) Early 90 ZR1’s
have an additional "Air Foil Bar/Wing"
bolted to the radiator air intake opening, just above the center front
spoiler that is painted the same color as the car. After 1990 models, this is not reported.
9)
Some early 90 ZR1 owners report having glass headlight bulbs (the rest of
us have plastic).
SUSPENSION
Selective Ride
Controls
DIMENSIONS
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1) Manual AC
(C60) was standard, with electronic control AC (C68) as an option.
Only 124 ZR-1’s were produced with manual AC. Known Production Numbers are: #418 / #713 /
#969 / #1040 / #1766 / #2086 / #2838/
#1039 / #1562 / #2431
2)
In the first
half of the 1990 model year, the CD radio came with a lock-out feature
(Delco-Loc II).
“Loc II” was printed on the face plate.
The owner was instructed to program a six-digit number into the radio. Whenever
the radio lost complete power, the number had to be used to unlock the radio,
otherwise the CD and cassette players were locked.
If the numbers were lost or forgotten, the radio could be re-programmed by the
dealer.
3)
A big “pizza
box” ZR1 Owner’s kit was sent to some.
This contained a leather portfolio case, copy of the window sticker, driver’s
manual, coffee table sized ZR1 book, keychain, video, and emergency key case.
INSTRUMENTATION
1) The early models
had a shift light (separate from the 1 to 4 light).
2) There are two
different types of DLCs on ZR1s. 90-93 uses the 12-pin DLC
seen on all GM cars since 1982.
3) There was no low
oil light option on the 1990 model, but the bulb position was in the DIC
(Driver's
Information Center).
WHEELS
The exclusive,
directional mag-type rear wheels and tires are 1-1/2” wider.
1991
EXTERIOR
1)
Curiously, some yellow 1990 and 91 Corvettes were
photo-chromatic - (Not on purpose...). If
you were to leave an object on the car in the sun and remove it later, the paint
would be darker under the object.
Sunlight actually changed the color of the paint – but it changed back later
like photo chromatic sunglasses do. The
paint was reformulated when discovered to eliminate this "unique
characteristic".
2)
It's rumored that on
4/23/91, a special color 1991 ZR1 was made for a dignitary - WA-9795
Green/gray.
3)
New horizontal front fender "gill"
panels.
4)
In 1991, ZR-1 maintained its own unique personality
with the CHMSL stop light over the glass hatch - and the wider rear stance.
All base models of Corvette now had the ZR-1 style convex rear with
square tail lights and a new wrap-around, streamlined front end with
color-coordinated rub strip around the body.
4)
Only the 91s had the 24 hour endurance champion sticker
from the factory on the bottom left side of the rear hatch glass.
(The L98’s have it too.)
5)
New version of the crossed flags emblems. The 1991
emblem has a Black Ring and the right hand side "Bowtie" background is Black
with a Red "Bowtie" outline - Black
filled. (1991-1996)( except 1993-40th anniversary -Chrome Ring).
6)
New “delay” feature meant power is continued for the
entertainment system and power windows up to 15 minutes after the ignition key
is turned to OFF, or until the driver’s door is opened.
INTERIOR
1) Interior was pretty much the same, but the
mid-dash sweep was a bit less squared.
2)
Seats were almost identical except the 91 included only one built-in left side
lumbar control switch per seat, while the 90’s seats had 2 controls - on left
and right sides of driver’s and passenger’s seats.
DRIVETRAIN
1) The dealer brochure incorrectly says that
Tuned-port fuel injection was replaced by Multi-port fuel injection in the 1991
– it was 1992.
2) Cylinder head Valve oil seals were added.
3) LT5 cam cover emblems change from red
background to black.
4) In '90 only the intake valves had seals. In '91 and up
seals were used on all of the valves.
NOTE: If an exhaust valve stem gets too dry it could stick or seize.
The '90 exhaust guides can be machined to accept seals.
SUSPENSION
1) Steering Overall ratio went from 15.6:1 to
15.7:1.
2) New Bosch ABS IIS
3) Among the options were heavy duty
suspension components so the ride could be adjusted from firm to very firm,
rather than from soft to firm found in earlier systems
DIMENSIONS
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1) Manual AC went away after the first
year and electronic control AC became standard.
2) The C-note horn was replaced with an
F-note beginning with the 1991 model.
3)
A big “pizza box” ZR1 Owner’s kit was sent to some. This contained a leather portfolio case, copy
of the window sticker, driver’s manual, coffee table sized ZR1 book, keychain,
video, and plastic emergency key case.
The only difference from the 1990 was the video and the coffee table book
contents.
INSTRUMENTATION
1) The power-key default was changed to OFF
with each restart of the car. The actual
key is different from the 1990 key. The Full Power light was relocated on the
Drivers Information Panel from the Upper Right Hand side for the 1990, to next
to the Full Power Key for 1991.
2) Manual AC went away with electronic control
AC becoming the standard.
WHEELS
1991 The new design “turbine-look” aluminum
mag wheels appeared to be moving even when the car was standing.
1992
EXTERIOR
1) The ZR-1 badge emblem was added to each
side front fender.
2) Exhaust tips changed from the two per side,
to one large rectangular per side.
3) New colors - Black Rose Metallic, Arctic
white, Bright Aqua Metallic, Polo II Green
Metallic. Deleted colors were Old
Polo Green (less blue-ish), Turquoise, Old White (identical color), Charcoal.
INTERIOR
1)
Saddle leather interior was discontinued, and Light
Beige was the replacement. Blue leather discontinued. Light Gray replaced the slightly darker gray
interior color.
2)
Steering wheel horn buttons changed from gray to black.
3) An option that was standard in the
earlier RPO ZR1 package was dropped 1/2 way though the 1992 year. The power
passenger seat RPO AC1, which had always been packaged into the ZR1 option was
pulled and had to be ordered separately.
4)
The little triangle buttons below the console seat
switches for the 1990 and 1991 models is discontinued.
5)
There are reportedly 12 White ZR1’s with white
interior, one White/White is # 502. Plus
there is one Red exterior/White interior '92 ZR-1 with VIN #392.
DRIVETRAIN
1)
Acceleration Slip Regulation (ASR) is introduced.
2)
92-up cars use a two-piece exhaust manifold design where the cat bolts to a
flange at the exhaust manifold outlet.
Also the design of the exhaust manifold was changed to prevent back-flow under
deceleration.
SUSPENSION
Suspension tuning change- reduction front
spring rate from 96.2 N/mm to 75.4N/mm,
reduction in rear spring rate from 39.9 N/mm
to 33.0 N/mm.
DIMENSIONS
See
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1)
The master cylinder bore was increased.
In addition, the front brake calipers were changed to increase the brake pedal
height.
2)
The big box ZR1
owner’s kit is discontinued.
INSTRUMENTATION
No changes
WHEELS
Tires went from Goodyear Gatorbacks to
Goodyear GS-Cs.
1993
EXTERIOR
1) A 40th Anniversary Ruby metallic
ZR-1 package was available only in 1993 with 245 ZR1’s made (5 were pilot-test
cars).
2)
Bright Red became Torch Red, Yellow became the
reformulated Competition Yellow code 53
3) A special order for Dark Red Metallic
(75U) with black leather was reportedly applied to only two cars. One of those
two '93s is VIN #0062. The color is very close and could be confused with the
"Dark Ruby Red Metallic" reserved for the 40th Anniversary Edition. There is a 40th dealer poster error
of a convertible in the plant with code 75U doors.
4) In '93 the plant switched to a new
clear (two-component polyurethane) that was typically applied thicker than the
previous flavor... The smoother “orange peel” appearance is due to the paint
technology change.
The 2 component paint has a longer wavelength (wider) peel than the previous
1-component, which was quite short (tight).
5) New Styrofoam inner bumper absorbers
were a midyear change. The cars were slightly overweight by EPA standards, so
this was one of the changes made late fall or winter 93.
6)
For the model year 1993 the BG plant began putting VIN's on the glass tops.
7) The Bowling
Green
emblem under the hood was replaced by the Mobil 1 emblem on Sept. 28, 1993, according to factory
info. But, 93-40th Anniversary ZR1 #381
has the Mobil 1 emblem.
8) The `93 offered an Arctic white interior
for ZR-1's.
INTERIOR
1) In 1993 GM once again included The
power passenger seat AC1 as part of the RPO ZR1 option.
2) The interior seat design was slightly
changed to a wider, more comfortable style and entry – exit became easier. In 93, all seats of every color had the 40th
anniversary emblem embroidered into the headrests.
3)
Torch red interior replaced bright red.
DRIVETRAIN
1)
Horsepower increased for the LT5 engine
to 405HP @5800RPM and 385lb. ft. of torque at 5200RPM. The increases came from
Head work; Revisions to the valves; Revised exhaust cam timing; a reduction of
restrictions in the exhaust system and an electrical - linear exhaust gas
recirculation (EGR) system for improved emission control; Revised injector
housings and injectors; Altered plenum for increased flow; Smog Changes; Reduced
rotating mass; 4 bolt cylinder case; Revised PROM; Oiling system improvements; Platinum Spark Plugs;
Synthetic Oil.
2)
The part # was
changed on the ZR-1 transmission from 10186865 to 10255122 starting on VIN
#800232 in the 1993 model year. Trans gear ratios stayed the same. The most significant internal changes found in
the ZF S6-40 540 Nm version is the increase in helical pitch of all the drive
gear teeth to be more quiet. Included in the 400 lb ft change, the 2nd, 3rd, 5th
and 6th speed gears went to a crimped spline-fit method of fastening the
synchronizer clutch body to these speed gears.
3)
Wiring change that the 93 and newer
Vettes had, which was to have the clutch switch moved from the high current
starter solenoid circuit to the coil side of the start relay circuit.
4)
SEQUENTIAL PORT FUEL INJECTION
SUSPENSION
No change
DIMENSIONS
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1) New ABS IIU
2)
Sometime between '93-94 model years the advanced
computation power of something called the "P8" ECM first came into existence in
the ZR-1. A full blown upgrade to the earlier 8 bit microcomputer, AKA the "P4"
design. With the later cars, LT5 engine RPM could now be resolved into +/-1 rpm
increments. Prior to 1993, ZR-1 ECMs could not resolve any better than +/-25 rpm
using the "P4" CPU architecture.
3)
From 1993 on, there are only four grease zerks on the
entire car- upper and lower ball joints.
INSTRUMENTATION
The 94 and 95 cars use the 16-pin "OBD2"type
DLC. The pin designations are not the same. They are located differently and use
numbers instead of letters.
WHEELS
Although the same in design as 1991- 92, the
1993's wheels had a different surface appearance achieved by a flat machining on
the fin tips.
1994
EXTERIOR
1) Two
new exterior colors were available, Admiral Blue and Copper Metallic. The Copper
did not make it the whole year due to problems with color match -116 were built
when the color was killed; and Medium Quasar Blue Metallic was discontinued.
2) In 1994 two one of a kind ZR-1's were
built. One was an Admiral Blue with Red interior and the other was a Competition
Yellow with Red interior.
INTERIOR
1) Interior revisions included addition
of a passenger-side airbag and knee bolster (and removal of the instrument panel
glove box), new seat and door trim panel designs, finer-weave carpeting,
"express down" driver's power window, and a redesigned two-spoke airbag steering
wheel.
2)
With sport seats, a single set of power assist controls
for both seats was console-mounted. Also, individual motors adjusted the lumbar
support for sport seats and these controls (and the side bolster control) were
relocated from the seat to the console for 1994.
The leather “hand” changed from a smooth texture to a rough, pebble patina.
3)
The tire jack was relocated from the exterior spare
tire well to an inside compartment behind the passenger seat.
4)
White interior is discontinued.
DRIVETRAIN
No change
SUSPENSION
No change
DIMENSIONS
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1)
Air conditioning systems were revised to use R-134A
refrigerant, a non-ozone depleting CFC substitute.
2)
On the owner’s Video, Dave Hill states there are over
280 small refinements or improvements for 94/95.
INSTRUMENTATION
New white instrument graphics turn to
tangerine at night.
WHEELS
New, non-directional spoke mag type wheels
were introduced.
1995
EXTERIOR
1) New front fender side vents reminiscent of
the golden age 1958-61 fender side coves. (also a little like the 1973 to 82
side cove)
2) A new exterior color, Dark Purple Metallic,
was added, but 1994's Copper Metallic
and Black Rose Metallic were deleted
INTERIOR
1) Sport Seats had stronger "French" seam
stitching
2) Out
of sight are numerous Velcro straps to reduce rattles
DRIVETRAIN
1)
The 6 speed manual was redesigned by replacement of the
reverse lockout with a high-détente design for easier operation.
2)
RE: The 1 to 4 lockout on the 6-speed. In 1995, these
requirements were reduced to the following: M.P.H. - 15 to 19; Throttle Angle -
Less than 13 Coolant temp: at least 120 degrees.
3)
Added the latest anti-lock/traction control (ABS/ASR-5)
system.
4)
Aluminized Stainless Steel
exhaust.
5)
Possible A. L. Dunn heads in the last few (estimated at
130) ZR1’s produced.
Some have mistaken the non-triangular cover having 2 bolts with center screw as
being 3 bolts. There is also a little
casting mark you can see with a mirror just under the cam covers of A.L. Dunn
heads - left of the dipstick as you look through the wheel well on the passenger
side.
There is sort of a rolling scroll (a similar font is bauhaus 93 if you look in
WORD or AOL) that reads "dunn" in
all small letters; and then what appears to be an "l" on the left side head, and an "r" on the right side head. The
dunn
casting mark is also present on the driver's side in about the same position.
6)
New plenum flow work is reported,
but needs definition.
7)
ABS controllers have a manual brake fluid bleed fitting on the side of the
controller, in the well behind the driver seat.
SUSPENSION
No change
DIMENSIONS
http://www.zr1netregistry.com/ZR1_dimensions.htm
ACCESSORIES
1)
A drip-tube was designed into the A-pillar
weather-strip for improved water intrusion control.
2)
A stronger radio mount installed for less CD skipping
3)
Windshield wiper arms were redesigned with revised contact angles
and higher contact force to reduce chatter at all speeds, and lift at high
speeds.
INSTRUMENTATION
No change
WHEELS
No change
Thanks to Randy Schulkers & Jerry Watts for putting this together.

QUESTION:
I understand there are some differences in transmission gears and torque in late
MY ZR-1's?
ANS: The following is an explanation from ZF regarding the HELICAL gears and
gear noise. I emailed my question to ZF Ind., as to my concern over ZF gear
noise when in first......I received several responses from the ZR-1 Net
regarding my concern, and they seemed very plausible. However, I decided to ask
ZF about the noise and the comparisons. This is what they said:"
"Dear Marshall,
You have been mis-informed. All S6-40 transmissions installed in the C4 Corvette
contain 100% helical gears. In fact, all of the gearboxes ZF produces for
passenger car applications contain helical gears, the primary purpose of which
is to increase gear contact ratio and thereby minimize gear noise.
There is one major difference between the model year (1989 - 1992) and (1993 -
1996) C4 Corvettes - the contact ratio for the later years was further increased
in order to reduce the gear noise. There, however, was a very slight reduction
in torque capacity of the gearbox (from 610Nm to 540 Nm) when ZF increased the
gear contact ratio in the later year transmissions.
The noise you hear in 1st gear is commonly termed "1st gear growl". This noise
is inherent to the design of the 610 Nm gearbox and in no way is detrimental to
the reliable function of the transmission and your ZR-1. With the increased gear
contact ratio in the 540Nm gearbox, ZF also was able to reduce the "1st gear
growl".
Thanks to Marshall D. Vernon and ZF for this info.
Additional Info on the ZF:
HOW TO IDENTIFY YOUR ZF's TORQUE CAPACITY:
The ID plate on the passenger side of the ZF 6-speed will
help you to identify if your transmission is of the 610 Nm (450
lb.ft.) capacity or of the 540 Nm (400 lb.ft.) capacity type.
The key number that you need to see is the "Parts List No.".
The following is a list of all of the ZF S6-40 6-speed types:
Part List No. Model Yr. Engine Shifter Style Torque (Nm)
----------------- ------------ --------- ---------------
1052 000 031 '89-'90 LT5 Lift Ring 610 Nm
1052 000 032 '89 L98 Lift Ring 610 Nm
1052 000 035 '91 LT5 Lift Ring 610 Nm
1052 000 036 '90-'91 L98 Lift Ring 610 Nm
1052 000 045 '92-'93 LT5 Lift Ring 610 Nm
1052 000 046 '93 LT1 Lift Ring 540 Nm
1052 000 047 '93 LT5 Lift Ring 540 Nm
1052 000 081 '94 LT5 Lift Ring 540 Nm
1052 000 084 '94 LT1 Lift Ring 540 Nm
1052 000 087 '95-'96 LT5 Crash Thru 540 Nm
1052 000 089 '95-'96 LT1/LT4 Crash Thru 540 Nm
Another note to remember is that if you have a ZF 6-speed which is mid '93 or
newer, 2nd gear nitrous bursts will eventually loosen the 2nd speed gear mounted
synchronizer clutch hub. This spells probable catastrophic damage after 50 - 150
juice cycles. ZR51 Performance can modify the weaker 540 Nm spline fit hubs of
these gears so that the separation will not occur ever. We Tig (digitally
controlled) weld a narrow bead over the spline fit producing a much more durable
ZF 6-speed unit. This is a very important thing to remember when considering who
to choose for rebuilding/modifying your ZF S6-40 6-speed transmission.
Thanks to Bill Boudreau from ZR51 Performance for this info.

QUESTION: Is the AC compressor in the
ZR-1 the same as in the other C4's?
ANS: No, the AC compressor in the ZR-1 is a Nippondenso, similar to the one used
on L98 Corvettes, but smaller in displacement. The L98 compressor is 12.7 cubic
inches, while the LT5 is 10.0 cubic inches.

QUESTION: What is the weight of the
LT5 engine?
ANS: The LT5 engines weighs 741 lbs. including shipping crate.
Here are some other weights:
L98 - Auto 431 lbs, Manual 592.2 lbs
LT1 - 452 lbs
LT4 - 1003.5 lbs
LS1 - Auto 457.6 lbs, Manual 497.2 lbs
LS6 - 497.2 lbs

QUESTION: Did GM build any right
hand drive ZR-1's?
ANS: No, GM never built any right hand drive ZR-1's. However there are several
out there in the world that have been converted. For example almost every
American car shipped to Australia are converted.
This info came from Colin Wolf:
1. About 95% of all American cars on Australian roads are converted. This
includes ZR-1's and C5's. Corvettes that are not converted are basically show
cars or special interest cars. If you were to offer a left hand drive C4
(including ZR-1) for sale in Australia, it would be regarded as a project car
for conversion, and not a drivable car suitable for registration. The price you
would obtain would reflect this.
2. Australian laws vary from state to state. However, in all of the most
populous states on the east coast, you cannot obtain a full vehicle registration
for a left hand drive vehicle. You can obtain a classic registration (or
similar), which allows you to drive on public roads to motoring events or to
workshops in your vicinity. Traveling interstate requires special permits. South
Australia, Western Australia and Northern Territory are more relaxed but have
only small numbers of Corvettes. The laws have changed just in the last year in
Queensland to allow cars over thirty years old to remain LHD and be road
registered.
3. Conversions from LHD to RHD are very common, and have been carried out for
more than fifty years by many companies on all manner of American and European
cars. One small part of the conversion scene is Corvettes, where about ten major
companies do most of the work. This includes C5's and less technical conversions
such as the basic rack and pinion C4's and even less technical again C3, C2 and
C1. Our largest local Corvette converter does about 150 cars a year, including
Vipers, all model Corvettes including C4 and C5, light commercial trucks, mainly
GMC etc.
4. The job of converting a ZR-1 includes converting the steering plus
accelerator, clutch, brake, mirror the dashboard, and completely rewire the car.
Most companies will have a complete set of fiberglass molds for fire wall, floor
pan, the many dash board components, air conditioning and ventilation ducts etc.
These are all finished to match the original ZR-1 finishes. The list goes on to
carpets, handbrake, decals, upholstery etc. As with all jobs, the devil is in
the detail. Things which separate the conversion of the interior are the correct
mirroring of the arm rest controls for windows and door locks, the mirroring of
the side which the center consoles swings from, correct functioning of air
conditioning ducts etc etc. Steering column stalks are not mirrored usually and
this can be confusing for a few miles. And yes, foot room is a big factor.
5. The ZR-1 rack and pinion steering cannot be inverted, because the pinion
would be in the wrong place. You need to find a suitable rack and pinion set
from another car, which when rotated will approximate the mirror placement of
the pinion. The route for the steering shaft is tortuous, and too large an angle
at any of the universal joints will produce some startling non-linearity in the
steering. Steering feel and responsiveness is always a big issue.
6. There are other road worthiness factors, such as the orange rear turn
indicator lights, the need for additional side indicator lights and the need for
Engineering compliance with Australian Design Rules. The present, fairly strict
system of licensing of converters is being further upgraded next year to include
quality assurance requirements to ISO 9001. Known as the RAWS (Registered
Automotive Workshop Scheme), one it's components will be the prohibition of
conversion and registration of vehicles with significant structural damage.
After May 2003 it will not be possible have cars which are written off or have
substantial structural damage resurface in Australia legally).
7. I paid about $20,000 Australian dollars for my conversion. $A1.00=$0.54US
8. Why would you do it? Simply so that you can drive your Z on the road. Would
you do it if the law allowed you to drive LHD? Difficult question. A late model
(C3 onwards) is worth more money if converted. You can recoup some of the
investment when you sell the car. A solid axle or a midyear is devalued by a
conversion, particularly no longer necessary. Me, I am comfortable with my right
hand drive ZR-1, which I drive to work a few days a week and my wife drives
occasionally.

QUESTION: Why do stock fuel injectors
go bad and leak?
ANS: Stock injectors can experience problems, some do some don't. One common
problem is leaking injectors caused by either fouling by combustion byproducts
or rust inside the injector. Any ZR-1 that sees lengthy periods of
non-operation, such as winter storage, may have problems with rusted injectors.
You can't see the rust, because it's internal but the symptoms of a rust problem
with be the same as leaky injectors due to fouling.
Another problem with the OE injectors is inconsistent flow rates. The ACDelco
Multec injectors can vary across a set of 16 by as much as 10% in flow rate and
it's common to see 6%.
If your injectors don't leak or have fouling problems, it is typical in a case
where you're looking for extra performance to flow test and mix/match as set of
stock injectors to get the flow variation down as low as possible. To do this
you need to deal with a service facility that has a pool of Multec injectors to
use in mixing/matching. Unfortunately, you also have to find an injector service
vendor that has a large pool of LT5 injectors because of the difference between
pri. and sec. injectors.
Bottom line: stock injectors will work ok but only if you have a set that flows
consistently across the set and doesn't leak.
Second bottom line: a better choice are RC Engineering/Lucas injectors. They
have stainless steel internals so they never rust. They typically come
off-the-shelf with a 1-1.5% range in flow variation.
The rotating disc fuel
metering system Lucas uses (compared to the ball-and-socket system inside the Delcos) is said to be quicker to respond to changes in injector pulse width.
That improves throttle response.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for above info. .

QUESTION: Does Plenum & Injector
Housing porting make a hp difference?
ANS: On the 90-92 engines, porting the housings is more beneficial than it is on
the 93-95s. Porting the plenum has the same effect on both engines. If the
porting is done right and you use one of the better exhausts, you'll see about
20-25hp a two-bolt motor and perhaps a bit less on four-bolt motor.
Thanks to Hib Halverson for above info.

QUESTION: What type of thermostats do
ZR-1's use and at what temps do they run?
ANS: AO Engineering LT5
160° start
168° partial
175° full
Stant LT5
178° start
195° partial
205° full
OE LT5
190° start
205° partial
above boiling full
Thanks to Hib Halverson for above info.

QUESTION: How do I reset the security
code in my radio?
ANS:
1. The factory did not install a code. The owner had the option of installing
one.
2. If it is a code problem, LOC should show on the driver information center
(DIC).
3. You are correct about the antenna (aerial) not extending if there is a code
in the radio.
4. The reason for the owner putting the code into the radio was that it made the
components of the radio only workable in that car. Therefore, if the radio was
stolen, it was of no use to the thief.
The radio cannot be fixed by taking it apart. The code has to be erased by a
long process of entering a decoding sequence that was only available from
General Motors. The dealers were not even allowed to have a copy of it. The
dealer had to call Detroit and they would talk him through decoding the radio.
Since you have no way to decode the radio that is in the car, your only option
is to replace the control head and receiver box with another one. Preferably not
another 90. A 91 will work.
Thanks to Gordon Killebrew for this info.

QUESTION: Outside of GM where can I
get a new key made?
ANS: You can visit one of two web site to get both keys made and a new keyfob:
http://www.streetkeys.com/
or
http://www.keylessride.com/
The Resistance Value for each Key Pellet is as follows:
1. 392 ohm (or 402 ?)
2. 523 ohm
3. 681 ohm
4. 887 ohm
5. 1.13 K ohm
6. 1.47 K ohm
7. 1.87 K ohm
8. 2.37 K ohm
9. 3.01 K ohm
10. 3.47 K ohm
11. 4.75 K ohm
12. 6.04 K ohm
13. 7.50 K ohm
14. 9.53 K ohm
15. 11.80 K ohm
You would need to know your "value" to get your key made to match your ZR-1.

QUESTION: What is this "Active
Suspension" on the ZR-1?
ANS: For info and pictures check out:
http://corvetteactioncenter.com/cgi-bin/archives/imageFolio.cgi?direct=1984_-_1996/ZR-1/Active_Suspension

QUESTION: Can I use the 405hp heads on a 375hp LT5?
ANS: The 405 hp heads fit the same as the 375 hp heads except for the addition
of dowel pins to align the injector housings. The dowel pins were added as an
upgrade in '93 as part of the 405 hp porting upgrade. The 375 hp injector
housings are not drilled for the dowel pin holes. For compatibility, simple
remove the pins from the 405 hp heads to sort of downgrade them to the 375 hp
standard.
The 405 hp heads will accept 375 hp and 405 hp spark plugs. They have dual spark
plug seats.
The 405 hp heads have slightly larger exhaust ports. They probably allow +3 hp
over the 375 hp heads.
Thanks to Marc Haibeck for the above info.

QUESTION: I heard the first year for the ZR-1 was
actually 1989?
ANS: Correct, GM built 3 production 1989 ZR-1's. One went to Rick Mears, a
second to Hendrix Motorsports and we believe the third is at the National
Corvette Museum.

QUESTION:
Are the Exhaust systems the same on the early and late model ZR-1's?
ANS: The exhaust systems follow the same pattern. The '90 -
'92 cars have the original very restrictive exhaust system. Going to a Corsa
system adds 15 hp. The '93 and up cars received the benefit of the LT1 mufflers.
Going to a Corsa system adds 5 hp. Here's a picture showing part of the problem
with the early system.
http://www.zr1specialist.com/HAT%20Web/Tech%20Info/High%20Exhaust%20Backpressure%20On%20Early%20Cars.pdf
It might be interesting to note that the '93 and
up LT5 exhaust system is the universal fit ZR-1 exhaust system. It will fit '90
- '95 cars. The '90 - '92 cars have a three bolt flange on the right side
exhaust manifold. The '93 - '95's have a slip fit on the right side. The three
bolt flange on the right exhaust manifold on the early cars is attached with a
clamp. The flange can be removed. After the flange is unbolted, the '93 - '95
exhaust system will slip fit onto the exhaust manifold pipe where the flange was
attached.

QUESTION: I've heard the NCM
has all the ZR-1 Dyno sheets, can we get a copy?
ANS:
Here is the Dyno sheet story.
They were originally delivered to the Corvette Assembly Plant. After
receiving them, no one at the Plant knew what they were or what they were for or
what to do with them. They were in boxes on pallets and the boxes were in pretty
bad shape.
We believe the Plant held them until the embargo was lifted and the statute
of limitations had expired.
Larry Hayes lined up Steve Campbell to do a seminar at the ZR-1 Gathering in
2001. This was our first time to meet Steve and we talked with him 3-4 times
while he was there. It was while he was there that it was discovered that the
information was at the Plant. Sometime after the Gathering, Jerry Watts and a
couple of NCM staff went over to the Plant and brought them over to the NCM in
June 2001.
With the help of Gary Cline, the NCM went through the information sent over
and weeded out the dyno sheets and engine diagrams and put everything in order
in the file cabinets. Currently, they are filed in new boxes and stored on the
top two rows of the shelving in the Library/Archives.
It was believed that the intent of Mercury Marine and Steve Campbell was for
the NCM to make copies of the information packets and make them available to
ZR-1 owners.
In August 30, 2001, Steve sent the NCM a letter. I read the letter this past
May when at the Gathering. I too look at a few dyno sheets.
"In discussions with the original LT-5 team, and separately with our legal
associates within General Motors and Mercury Marine, we have formed an answer to
the publication of the dyno HP numbers. Collectively, we have arrived at a
decision that publication of the LT-5 pre-break-in horsepower numbers would not
be in the best interest of the ZR-1".
Since 2001, the NCM has re-visited the issue of making these dyno sheets and
other info available with Rick Baldick, Nate Love, Joe Spielman, and Tom Wallace
- with no satisfaction as they all stated these were being withheld due to GM
Legal.

QUESTION: I heard some early LT5
engines blew up?
ANS: In late November 1990 LT5's began blowing up at BG.
Engineers involved in the LT5 program were called in. After many
long nights it was finally discovered that one of the parking assistants for
Allied Trucking owned an old Mustang and she had to floor the throttle to keep
it from flooding. She did the same thing with the Corvettes she was parking. At
some point, in very cold weather, she did the same thing to LT5's.
Speculation is that the deflated chain tensioners didn't help the cam oiling
system either.
They finally determined the tools used to machine the cam bores were near the
worn side and therefore the tolerances were closer on some than others. The
engines effected were right at the 1100 mark, therefore, they stopped selling
and delivering ZR-1's for a couple of months in late 1990-early 1991, and gave
those engines a wide berth, securing many before and many after. Those were VINs
1000-1200. The Mercrusier "fix" was to just let them break in by themselves.